Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus TG-320
95 Imaging
36 Features
21 Overall
30
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus TG-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 146g - 93 x 56 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2012
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus TG-320 Overview
The following is a complete comparison of the Olympus FE-4030 versus Olympus TG-320, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof and both are manufactured by Olympus. The image resolution of the FE-4030 (14MP) and the TG-320 (14MP) is fairly comparable and they possess the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe FE-4030 was unveiled 24 months prior to the TG-320 making the cameras a generation away from one another. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting through a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the FE-4030 matches up versus the TG-320 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus TG-320 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus FE-4030 & Olympus TG-320. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus FE-4030 Gallery & Olympus TG-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4030 over the Olympus TG-320
| FE-4030 | TG-320 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Olympus FE-4030
| TG-320 | FE-4030 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2012 |  | January 2010 | Newer by 24 months |
Common features in the Olympus FE-4030 and Olympus TG-320
| FE-4030 | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Identical display measurement |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Equal display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus TG-320 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to travel with your camera often, you should factor its weight and size. The Olympus FE-4030 features exterior dimensions of 93mm x 56mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") with a weight of 146 grams (0.32 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-320 has specifications of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") and a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
See the Olympus FE-4030 versus Olympus TG-320 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are using at the time. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the FE-4030 against the TG-320.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the FE-4030 and TG-320 is 95 and 94 respectively.
Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus TG-320 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its hard to visualize the contrast in sensor dimensions purely by seeing specs. The picture here will give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the FE-4030 and TG-320.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the same MP therefore you can expect comparable quality of files although you may want to factor the launch date of the cameras into account. The more aged FE-4030 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus TG-320 Specifications
| Olympus FE-4030 | Olympus TG-320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus FE-4030 | Olympus TG-320 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2010-01-07 | 2012-01-10 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-105mm (4.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.6-5.9 | f/3.5-5.1 |
| Macro focusing distance | 4cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.80 m | 5.80 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 146 grams (0.32 lb) | 155 grams (0.34 lb) |
| Dimensions | 93 x 56 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 150 images |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $130 | $0 |