Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS
95 Imaging
36 Features
21 Overall
30
91 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 146g - 93 x 56 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 214g - 109 x 67 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2013
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Overview
Its time to take a closer look at the Olympus FE-4030 and Olympus TG-830 iHS, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof and they are both manufactured by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the FE-4030 (14MP) and the TG-830 iHS (16MP) is relatively well matched and they feature the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe FE-4030 was unveiled 4 years before the TG-830 iHS and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the FE-4030 matches up versus the TG-830 iHS with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus FE-4030 and Olympus TG-830 iHS. The full galleries are available at Olympus FE-4030 Gallery and Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4030 over the Olympus TG-830 iHS
| FE-4030 | TG-830 iHS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-830 iHS over the Olympus FE-4030
| TG-830 iHS | FE-4030 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2013 |  | January 2010 | More recent by 36 months |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus FE-4030 and Olympus TG-830 iHS
| FE-4030 | TG-830 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Missing Touch screen |
Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Physical Comparison
If you're intending to lug around your camera often, you'll need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus FE-4030 has exterior dimensions of 93mm x 56mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 146 grams (0.32 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-830 iHS has dimensions of 109mm x 67mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") and a weight of 214 grams (0.47 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus FE-4030 and Olympus TG-830 iHS in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the FE-4030 compared to the TG-830 iHS.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the FE-4030 and TG-830 iHS is 95 and 91 respectively.
Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is hard to see the contrast between sensor measurements simply by checking specifications. The graphic here may give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the FE-4030 and TG-830 iHS.
Plainly, the two cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same resolution. You should count on the Olympus TG-830 iHS to give you extra detail having an extra 2MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs a little more aggressively. The older FE-4030 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Specifications
| Olympus FE-4030 | Olympus TG-830 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus FE-4030 | Olympus TG-830 iHS |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2010-01-07 | 2013-01-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-105mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.6-5.9 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 4cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.80 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 146 grams (0.32 lb) | 214 grams (0.47 lb) |
| Dimensions | 93 x 56 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 109 x 67 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 pictures |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $130 | $0 |