Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus TG-860
80 Imaging
61 Features
88 Overall
71
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2c365/2c36512778594cdfbf2b2301f5cdebbcaebbc0db" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M5 III front Olympus OM-D E-M5 III front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/042ab/042ab9bda5359b24c15525e105c8dbb85792e213" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 front Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 front"
91 Imaging
40 Features
42 Overall
40
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus TG-860 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 414g - 125 x 85 x 50mm
- Launched October 2019
- Superseded the Olympus E-M5 II
- Newer Model is OM System OM-5
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 224g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Launched February 2015
- Successor is Olympus TG-870
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus TG-860 Overview
The following is a detailed comparison of the Olympus E-M5 III versus Olympus TG-860, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Waterproof and they are both sold by Olympus. There exists a large gap among the image resolutions of the E-M5 III (20MP) and TG-860 (16MP) and the E-M5 III (Four Thirds) and TG-860 (1/2.3") boast different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The E-M5 III was announced 4 years after the TG-860 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M5 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-860 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going straight to a detailed comparison, here is a concise overview of how the E-M5 III grades versus the TG-860 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus TG-860 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M5 III & Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-M5 III Gallery & Olympus TG-860 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 III over the Olympus TG-860
E-M5 III | TG-860 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | October 2019 | ![]() | February 2015 | Newer by 58 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Very accurate focus | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper screen (+580k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-860 over the Olympus E-M5 III
TG-860 | E-M5 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 III and Olympus TG-860
E-M5 III | TG-860 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen measurement |
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus TG-860 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to travel with your camera frequently, you'll have to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M5 III has got outside dimensions of 125mm x 85mm x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") having a weight of 414 grams (0.91 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-860 has sizing of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs).
See the Olympus E-M5 III versus Olympus TG-860 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you select at that time. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the E-M5 III and the TG-860.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e6d29/e6d29c1afdba8b7af5ab8186164eafa1f17beadb" alt="Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus TG-860 size comparison Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus TG-860 size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M5 III and TG-860 is 80 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4d2bc/4d2bcaad43b7ead5b90c8ae717293650cdb59ef4" alt="Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus TG-860 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus TG-860 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus TG-860 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is hard to imagine the contrast in sensor dimensions simply by checking out specs. The image below will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M5 III and TG-860.
All in all, each of the cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-M5 III using its bigger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh easier and the Olympus E-M5 III will produce more detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs way more aggressively. The newer E-M5 III provides an advantage in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a1aaa/a1aaa60d40e7606a0d3259363b8a185a1ffaf241" alt="Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus TG-860 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus TG-860 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus TG-860 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09816/09816f206234efe52f500445fdf94b5fdd8acc00" alt="Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus TG-860 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus TG-860 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus TG-860 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 |
Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Launched | 2019-10-17 | 2015-02-06 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VIII | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | MOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.5-5.7 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 1,040k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 30.0 frames per sec | 7.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Yes |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 414 grams (0.91 lb) | 224 grams (0.49 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 125 x 85 x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 310 shots | 300 shots |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLN-1 | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail pricing | $1,199 | $279 |