Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus TG-4
95 Imaging
36 Features
21 Overall
30
90 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus TG-4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 146g - 93 x 56 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Announced April 2015
- Earlier Model is Olympus TG-3
- Replacement is Olympus TG-5
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus TG-4 Overview
Its time to take a deeper look at the Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus TG-4, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof and both of them are designed by Olympus. The resolution of the FE-4030 (14MP) and the TG-4 (16MP) is pretty close and they feature the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe FE-4030 was announced 6 years earlier than the TG-4 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving through a full comparison, below is a brief view of how the FE-4030 scores versus the TG-4 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus TG-4 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus FE-4030 and Olympus Tough TG-4. The whole galleries are available at Olympus FE-4030 Gallery and Olympus TG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4030 over the Olympus TG-4
| FE-4030 | TG-4 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Olympus FE-4030
| TG-4 | FE-4030 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | April 2015 |  | January 2010 | More recent by 64 months |
| Manual focus |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus FE-4030 and Olympus TG-4
| FE-4030 | TG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither has Touch screen |
Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus TG-4 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to lug around your camera frequently, you will need to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus FE-4030 has outer dimensions of 93mm x 56mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") with a weight of 146 grams (0.32 lbs) while the Olympus TG-4 has sizing of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") and a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Look at the Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus TG-4 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are working with at the time. The following is the front view proportions comparison of the FE-4030 and the TG-4.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the FE-4030 and TG-4 is 95 and 90 respectively.
Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus TG-4 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very hard to visualise the gap in sensor measurements just by looking through specifications. The photograph here should give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the FE-4030 and TG-4.
To sum up, each of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same MP. You should expect the Olympus TG-4 to provide you with greater detail with its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs a little more aggressively. The older FE-4030 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus TG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus TG-4 Specifications
| Olympus FE-4030 | Olympus Tough TG-4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus FE-4030 | Olympus Tough TG-4 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2010-01-07 | 2015-04-13 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-105mm (4.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.6-5.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 4cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.80 m | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264, Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 146 gr (0.32 lb) | 247 gr (0.54 lb) |
| Dimensions | 93 x 56 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 380 photographs |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $130 | $379 |