Olympus FE-4030 vs Panasonic ZS200
95 Imaging
36 Features
21 Overall
30
86 Imaging
53 Features
66 Overall
58
Olympus FE-4030 vs Panasonic ZS200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 146g - 93 x 56 x 22mm
- Announced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Push to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-360mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 340g - 111 x 66 x 45mm
- Announced February 2018
- Additionally referred to as Lumix DC-TZ200
- Previous Model is Panasonic ZS100
Olympus FE-4030 vs Panasonic ZS200 Overview
Below, we will be comparing the Olympus FE-4030 and Panasonic ZS200, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There is a substantial difference among the resolutions of the FE-4030 (14MP) and ZS200 (20MP) and the FE-4030 (1/2.3") and ZS200 (1") possess totally different sensor measurements.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe FE-4030 was manufactured 9 years before the ZS200 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus FE-4030 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic ZS200 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before diving straight into a thorough comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the FE-4030 matches up versus the ZS200 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus FE-4030 vs Panasonic ZS200 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus FE-4030 & Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus FE-4030 Gallery & Panasonic ZS200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4030 over the Panasonic ZS200
FE-4030 | ZS200 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS200 over the Olympus FE-4030
ZS200 | FE-4030 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2018 | January 2010 | Newer by 98 months | |
Manual focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 1240k | 230k | Clearer screen (+1010k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus FE-4030 and Panasonic ZS200
FE-4030 | ZS200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus FE-4030 vs Panasonic ZS200 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to travel with your camera frequently, you'll need to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus FE-4030 has outside dimensions of 93mm x 56mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 146 grams (0.32 lbs) and the Panasonic ZS200 has proportions of 111mm x 66mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") having a weight of 340 grams (0.75 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus FE-4030 and Panasonic ZS200 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have chosen at that moment. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the FE-4030 compared to the ZS200.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the FE-4030 and ZS200 is 95 and 86 respectively.
Olympus FE-4030 vs Panasonic ZS200 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's difficult to see the contrast in sensor dimensions simply by checking out technical specs. The picture here should provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the FE-4030 and ZS200.
As you can tell, each of these cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The FE-4030 due to its smaller sensor will make achieving shallow DOF more difficult and the Panasonic ZS200 will show more detail due to its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The more aged FE-4030 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus FE-4030 vs Panasonic ZS200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus FE-4030 vs Panasonic ZS200 Specifications
Olympus FE-4030 | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus FE-4030 | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 |
Also Known as | - | Lumix DC-TZ200 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2010-01-07 | 2018-02-13 |
Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CCD | MOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 125 |
RAW files | ||
Min enhanced ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 26-105mm (4.0x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.6-5.9 | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focusing distance | 4cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 230k dots | 1,240k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,330k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.53x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Max quiet shutter speed | - | 1/16000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m | 6.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 146 gr (0.32 lb) | 340 gr (0.75 lb) |
Dimensions | 93 x 56 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 111 x 66 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 370 photographs |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $130 | $800 |