Olympus FE-4030 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS
95 Imaging
36 Features
21 Overall
30
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/df25a/df25aa9816ff75de9ec5c01cb9e2891c99ee04df" alt="Olympus FE-4030 front Olympus FE-4030 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c1b1a/c1b1aca5a367ce52d585dfa9c9ef670048d691fe" alt="Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS front Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS front"
91 Imaging
39 Features
37 Overall
38
Olympus FE-4030 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 146g - 93 x 56 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 198g - 122 x 61 x 30mm
- Launched February 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus FE-4030 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Overview
Let's look more closely at the Olympus FE-4030 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Olympus and Pentax. The sensor resolution of the FE-4030 (14MP) and the WG-2 GPS (16MP) is relatively well matched and both cameras boast the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The FE-4030 was introduced 3 years earlier than the WG-2 GPS which is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a complete comparison, here is a quick summation of how the FE-4030 grades vs the WG-2 GPS with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus FE-4030 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus FE-4030 and Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS. The whole galleries are available at Olympus FE-4030 Gallery and Pentax WG-2 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4030 over the Pentax WG-2 GPS
FE-4030 | WG-2 GPS |
---|
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-2 GPS over the Olympus FE-4030
WG-2 GPS | FE-4030 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2012 | ![]() | January 2010 | More modern by 25 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Very accurate focus | ||
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus FE-4030 and Pentax WG-2 GPS
FE-4030 | WG-2 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Olympus FE-4030 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry around your camera often, you'll need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus FE-4030 comes with outer dimensions of 93mm x 56mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") with a weight of 146 grams (0.32 lbs) and the Pentax WG-2 GPS has proportions of 122mm x 61mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 198 grams (0.44 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus FE-4030 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are working with at that time. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the FE-4030 against the WG-2 GPS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/180a2/180a2151ef53e53d9b3990f48291abd8a1776cf7" alt="Olympus FE-4030 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS size comparison Olympus FE-4030 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the FE-4030 and WG-2 GPS is 95 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5020f/5020f2b31d94fc57af8d799d7a6fd46f9b244690" alt="Olympus FE-4030 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS top view buttons comparison Olympus FE-4030 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS top view buttons comparison"
Olympus FE-4030 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is tough to picture the contrast between sensor sizes just by checking a spec sheet. The pic below will offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the FE-4030 and WG-2 GPS.
As you can see, both of these cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different megapixels. You should count on the Pentax WG-2 GPS to give extra detail using its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will help you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more aged FE-4030 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b3220/b32202f0fa223282288c12a36ffb57a411debff8" alt="Olympus FE-4030 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS sensor size comparison Olympus FE-4030 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS sensor size comparison"
Olympus FE-4030 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7017b/7017b60b22651e781bf0814d1b2c665db5fb5778" alt="Olympus FE-4030 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus FE-4030 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus FE-4030 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Specifications
Olympus FE-4030 | Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus FE-4030 | Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2010-01-07 | 2012-02-07 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 125 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 26-105mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.6-5.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus range | 4cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | - | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 1.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m | 5.40 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 146g (0.32 lbs) | 198g (0.44 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 93 x 56 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 122 x 61 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 260 shots |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $130 | $300 |