Clicky

Olympus FE-4030 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV

Portability
95
Imaging
37
Features
21
Overall
30
Olympus FE-4030 front
 
Ricoh GR Digital IV front
Portability
92
Imaging
35
Features
47
Overall
39

Olympus FE-4030 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Key Specs

Olympus FE-4030
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
  • 146g - 93 x 56 x 22mm
  • Announced January 2010
Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28mm (F1.9) lens
  • 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
  • Announced September 2011
  • Older Model is Ricoh GR Digital III
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus FE-4030 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Overview

Let's take a deeper look at the Olympus FE-4030 versus Ricoh GR Digital IV, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by companies Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a substantial gap between the resolutions of the FE-4030 (14MP) and GR Digital IV (10MP) and the FE-4030 (1/2.3") and GR Digital IV (1/1.7") boast totally different sensor dimensions.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The FE-4030 was released 20 months before the GR Digital IV making them a generation apart from one another. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before we go straight to a thorough comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the FE-4030 matches up against the GR Digital IV when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4030 over the Ricoh GR Digital IV

 FE-4030 GR Digital IV 

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Olympus FE-4030

 GR Digital IV FE-4030 
AnnouncedSeptember 2011January 2010Fresher by 20 months
Manually focus Very exact focusing
Display size3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution1230k230kCrisper display (+1000k dot)

Common features in the Olympus FE-4030 and Ricoh GR Digital IV

 FE-4030 GR Digital IV 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen
Touch display Neither includes Touch display

Olympus FE-4030 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Physical Comparison

For those who are aiming to carry your camera frequently, you have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus FE-4030 features external dimensions of 93mm x 56mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 146 grams (0.32 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GR Digital IV has dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).

Analyze the Olympus FE-4030 versus Ricoh GR Digital IV in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Following is a front view size comparison of the FE-4030 and the GR Digital IV.

Olympus FE-4030 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the FE-4030 and GR Digital IV is 95 and 92 respectively.

Olympus FE-4030 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV top view buttons comparison

Olympus FE-4030 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it is difficult to see the difference between sensor sizing just by checking technical specs. The photograph underneath may provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the FE-4030 and GR Digital IV.

As you have seen, both cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The FE-4030 due to its tinier sensor will make shooting shallow DOF trickier and the Olympus FE-4030 will give extra detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images way more aggressively. The older FE-4030 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus FE-4030 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV sensor size comparison

Olympus FE-4030 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus FE-4030 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus FE-4030 as a Portrait photography camera
Ricoh GR Digital IV as a Portrait photography camera
28
good MP (14 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
manual mode not possible
external flash not possible
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
41
you can focus manually
delivers RAW files
low MP (10MP)
tiny sensor (1/1.7")
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Olympus FE-4030 Street photography highlights
Ricoh GR Digital IV Street photography highlights
48
no moving screen
no image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
65
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW files
screen does not articulate
tiny sensor (1/1.7")
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus FE-4030
Sports photography with Ricoh GR Digital IV
35
good MP (14 megapixels)
supports tracking focus
no shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
34
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
better than average battery life (390 shots)
fixed focal length (28mm)
low MP (10MP)
tiny sensor (1/1.7")
does not have phase detect auto focus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Olympus FE-4030 Travel photography info
Ricoh GR Digital IV Travel photography info
65
good MP (14MP)
has built in flash
decently wide (26mm)
lack of Timelapse mode
does not contain selfie friendly display
slow max aperture (f2.6)
67
better than average battery life (390 shots)
flash built-in
great max aperture (f1.9)
low MP (10MP)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Olympus FE-4030 as a Landscape photography camera
Ricoh GR Digital IV as a Landscape photography camera
33
decently wide (26mm)
good MP (14 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.6)
screen is somewhat small (2.7")
manual mode not possible
no image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
lack of Timelapse mode
53
you can focus manually
great max aperture (f1.9)
screen size is decent (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW files
better than average battery life (390 shots)
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (28mm)
low MP (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/1.7")
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus FE-4030
Vlogging with Ricoh GR Digital IV
26
decently wide (26mm)
slow max aperture (f2.6)
does not contain selfie friendly display
no image stabilization
video res low (640 x 480 pxls)
lack of microphone port
29
great max aperture (f1.9)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
video res low (640 x 480 pixels)
missing mic support
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Olympus FE-4030 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus FE-4030 and Ricoh GR Digital IV
 Olympus FE-4030Ricoh GR Digital IV
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Ricoh
Model Olympus FE-4030 Ricoh GR Digital IV
Class Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Announced 2010-01-07 2011-09-15
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic III -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/1.7"
Sensor dimensions 6.08 x 4.56mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor area 27.7mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Peak resolution 4288 x 3216 3648 x 2736
Highest native ISO 1600 3200
Min native ISO 64 80
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 26-105mm (4.0x) 28mm (1x)
Maximum aperture f/2.6-5.9 f/1.9
Macro focus range 4cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.9 4.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.7" 3"
Resolution of screen 230 thousand dots 1,230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Optical (optional)
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4s 1s
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 5.80 m 3.00 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Highest video resolution 640x480 640x480
Video data format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 146 gr (0.32 lb) 190 gr (0.42 lb)
Physical dimensions 93 x 56 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 390 photos
Battery style - Battery Pack
Battery model - DB65
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 seconds) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC, Internal SD/SDHC, Internal
Card slots One One
Launch cost $130 $599