Olympus FE-4030 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV
95 Imaging
36 Features
21 Overall
30
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/df25a/df25aa9816ff75de9ec5c01cb9e2891c99ee04df" alt="Olympus FE-4030 front Olympus FE-4030 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/66cf9/66cf9a75906dc0e9f2d3d249d34bb9f3f9d5798c" alt="Ricoh GR Digital IV front Ricoh GR Digital IV front"
92 Imaging
35 Features
47 Overall
39
Olympus FE-4030 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 146g - 93 x 56 x 22mm
- Announced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Announced September 2011
- Older Model is Ricoh GR Digital III
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus FE-4030 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Overview
Let's take a deeper look at the Olympus FE-4030 versus Ricoh GR Digital IV, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by companies Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a substantial gap between the resolutions of the FE-4030 (14MP) and GR Digital IV (10MP) and the FE-4030 (1/2.3") and GR Digital IV (1/1.7") boast totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The FE-4030 was released 20 months before the GR Digital IV making them a generation apart from one another. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a thorough comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the FE-4030 matches up against the GR Digital IV when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus FE-4030 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus FE-4030 & Ricoh GR Digital IV. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus FE-4030 Gallery & Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4030 over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
FE-4030 | GR Digital IV |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Olympus FE-4030
GR Digital IV | FE-4030 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2011 | ![]() | January 2010 | Fresher by 20 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 1230k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+1000k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus FE-4030 and Ricoh GR Digital IV
FE-4030 | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither includes Touch display |
Olympus FE-4030 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry your camera frequently, you have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus FE-4030 features external dimensions of 93mm x 56mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 146 grams (0.32 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GR Digital IV has dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus FE-4030 versus Ricoh GR Digital IV in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Following is a front view size comparison of the FE-4030 and the GR Digital IV.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2646f/2646f1c296412b479974cbce8370c70712daad1e" alt="Olympus FE-4030 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV size comparison Olympus FE-4030 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the FE-4030 and GR Digital IV is 95 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8bac6/8bac6866e5d734c25691ae4246372de1b705f9aa" alt="Olympus FE-4030 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV top view buttons comparison Olympus FE-4030 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV top view buttons comparison"
Olympus FE-4030 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is difficult to see the difference between sensor sizing just by checking technical specs. The photograph underneath may provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the FE-4030 and GR Digital IV.
As you have seen, both cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The FE-4030 due to its tinier sensor will make shooting shallow DOF trickier and the Olympus FE-4030 will give extra detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images way more aggressively. The older FE-4030 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ee552/ee552c4a06b0536c0b46a6fe729710b69e8149d2" alt="Olympus FE-4030 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV sensor size comparison Olympus FE-4030 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV sensor size comparison"
Olympus FE-4030 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a1978/a1978ad54e2edf347af9cfc4f69793ad609bf6af" alt="Olympus FE-4030 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus FE-4030 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus FE-4030 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Specifications
Olympus FE-4030 | Ricoh GR Digital IV | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus FE-4030 | Ricoh GR Digital IV |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2010-01-07 | 2011-09-15 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 26-105mm (4.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.6-5.9 | f/1.9 |
Macro focus range | 4cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 1,230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 1s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m | 3.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 146 gr (0.32 lb) | 190 gr (0.42 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 93 x 56 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 390 photos |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | DB65 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $130 | $599 |