Olympus FE-4030 vs Ricoh WG-50
95 Imaging
36 Features
21 Overall
30
91 Imaging
41 Features
39 Overall
40
Olympus FE-4030 vs Ricoh WG-50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 146g - 93 x 56 x 22mm
- Released January 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Released May 2017
Photography Glossary Olympus FE-4030 vs Ricoh WG-50 Overview
On this page, we will be contrasting the Olympus FE-4030 vs Ricoh WG-50, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by brands Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the FE-4030 (14MP) and the WG-50 (16MP) is relatively comparable and both cameras offer the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe FE-4030 was manufactured 8 years earlier than the WG-50 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple overview of how the FE-4030 grades vs the WG-50 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus FE-4030 vs Ricoh WG-50 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus FE-4030 & Ricoh WG-50. The entire galleries are available at Olympus FE-4030 Gallery & Ricoh WG-50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4030 over the Ricoh WG-50
| FE-4030 | WG-50 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Olympus FE-4030
| WG-50 | FE-4030 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | May 2017 |  | January 2010 | More recent by 89 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very exact focusing |
Common features in the Olympus FE-4030 and Ricoh WG-50
| FE-4030 | WG-50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Equal screen sizing |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | The same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Olympus FE-4030 vs Ricoh WG-50 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to lug around your camera often, you're going to have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus FE-4030 has got external dimensions of 93mm x 56mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 146 grams (0.32 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-50 has measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Compare the Olympus FE-4030 vs Ricoh WG-50 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are employing at that time. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the FE-4030 versus the WG-50.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the FE-4030 and WG-50 is 95 and 91 respectively.
Olympus FE-4030 vs Ricoh WG-50 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is tough to envision the contrast in sensor measurements only by checking out specs. The graphic underneath should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the FE-4030 and WG-50.
All in all, the 2 cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Ricoh WG-50 to produce greater detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The older FE-4030 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus FE-4030 vs Ricoh WG-50 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus FE-4030 vs Ricoh WG-50 Specifications
| Olympus FE-4030 | Ricoh WG-50 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus FE-4030 | Ricoh WG-50 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2010-01-07 | 2017-05-24 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-105mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.6-5.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 4cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 8.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.80 m | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | On, off |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Yes (Wireless) |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 146g (0.32 pounds) | 193g (0.43 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 93 x 56 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 pictures |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $130 | $280 |