Olympus FE-4030 vs Ricoh WG-6
95 Imaging
37 Features
21 Overall
30
89 Imaging
47 Features
46 Overall
46
Olympus FE-4030 vs Ricoh WG-6 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 146g - 93 x 56 x 22mm
- Released January 2010
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 246g - 118 x 66 x 33mm
- Launched February 2018
- Superseded the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus FE-4030 vs Ricoh WG-6 Overview
On this page, we are comparing the Olympus FE-4030 and Ricoh WG-6, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by companies Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a noticeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the FE-4030 (14MP) and WG-6 (20MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe FE-4030 was announced 9 years earlier than the WG-6 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a complete comparison, here is a quick view of how the FE-4030 grades vs the WG-6 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus FE-4030 vs Ricoh WG-6 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus FE-4030 & Ricoh WG-6. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus FE-4030 Gallery & Ricoh WG-6 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4030 over the Ricoh WG-6
| FE-4030 | WG-6 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-6 over the Olympus FE-4030
| WG-6 | FE-4030 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2018 |  | January 2010 | Fresher by 98 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 1040k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+810k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus FE-4030 and Ricoh WG-6
| FE-4030 | WG-6 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither has Touch friendly display |
Olympus FE-4030 vs Ricoh WG-6 Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry your camera frequently, you'll need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus FE-4030 has physical measurements of 93mm x 56mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 146 grams (0.32 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-6 has dimensions of 118mm x 66mm x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") having a weight of 246 grams (0.54 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus FE-4030 and Ricoh WG-6 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you choose at that time. Following is a front view scale comparison of the FE-4030 compared to the WG-6.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the FE-4030 and WG-6 is 95 and 89 respectively.
Olympus FE-4030 vs Ricoh WG-6 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is difficult to imagine the gap between sensor sizing simply by looking at a spec sheet. The graphic underneath may provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the FE-4030 and WG-6.
Clearly, the two cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different MP. You can expect to see the Ricoh WG-6 to give more detail with its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics more aggressively. The older FE-4030 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Olympus FE-4030 vs Ricoh WG-6 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus FE-4030 vs Ricoh WG-6 Specifications
| Olympus FE-4030 | Ricoh WG-6 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus FE-4030 | Ricoh WG-6 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2010-01-07 | 2018-02-21 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-105mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.6-5.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus range | 4cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 1,040 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.80 m | 5.50 m (with Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Flash on, flash off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 3840x2160 |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Supports FlashAir SD cards |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | DB-110 lithium-ion battery & USB charger |
| GPS | None | Built-in |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 146g (0.32 lb) | 246g (0.54 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 93 x 56 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 118 x 66 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 340 shots |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $130 | $271 |
