Clicky

Olympus FE-4030 vs Ricoh WG-70

Portability
95
Imaging
36
Features
21
Overall
30
Olympus FE-4030 front
 
Ricoh WG-70 front
Portability
91
Imaging
43
Features
39
Overall
41

Olympus FE-4030 vs Ricoh WG-70 Key Specs

Olympus FE-4030
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
  • 146g - 93 x 56 x 22mm
  • Introduced January 2010
Ricoh WG-70
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Digital Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
  • 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
  • Released February 2020
  • New Model is Ricoh WG-80
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus FE-4030 vs Ricoh WG-70 Overview

Here, we will be comparing the Olympus FE-4030 versus Ricoh WG-70, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the FE-4030 (14MP) and the WG-70 (16MP) is relatively close and both cameras posses the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The FE-4030 was introduced 11 years prior to the WG-70 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before we go into a full comparison, here is a concise overview of how the FE-4030 scores vs the WG-70 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4030 over the Ricoh WG-70

 FE-4030 WG-70 

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-70 over the Olympus FE-4030

 WG-70 FE-4030 
ReleasedFebruary 2020January 2010More recent by 122 months
Manually focus Dial accurate focus

Common features in the Olympus FE-4030 and Ricoh WG-70

 FE-4030 WG-70 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen size2.7"2.7"Same screen measurement
Screen resolution230k230kThe same screen resolution
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch screen Neither provides Touch screen

Olympus FE-4030 vs Ricoh WG-70 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you have to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus FE-4030 provides outer measurements of 93mm x 56mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 146 grams (0.32 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-70 has sizing of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus FE-4030 versus Ricoh WG-70 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have at the time. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the FE-4030 and the WG-70.

Olympus FE-4030 vs Ricoh WG-70 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the FE-4030 and WG-70 is 95 and 91 respectively.

Olympus FE-4030 vs Ricoh WG-70 top view buttons comparison

Olympus FE-4030 vs Ricoh WG-70 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it can be hard to visualise the contrast in sensor measurements only by researching specifications. The graphic below will offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the FE-4030 and WG-70.

To sum up, each of the cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same megapixels. You can count on the Ricoh WG-70 to render greater detail using its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will help you crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The older FE-4030 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus FE-4030 vs Ricoh WG-70 sensor size comparison

Olympus FE-4030 vs Ricoh WG-70 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus FE-4030 vs Ricoh WG-70 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus FE-4030 Portrait photography info
Ricoh WG-70 Portrait photography info
28
good MP (14MP)
lack of manual focus
manual mode not available
external flash not possible
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
42
manual focus
decent MP (16MP)
includes face detect autofocus
no manual control
no external flash support
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Olympus FE-4030 as a Street photography camera
Ricoh WG-70 as a Street photography camera
48
no articulating screen
lack of image stabilization
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
62
image stabilization (Digital)
weather proofing
fixed screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Olympus FE-4030 Sports photography advice
Ricoh WG-70 Sports photography advice
34
good MP (14 megapixels)
includes tracking autofocus
lack of shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
50
image stabilization (Digital)
decent MP (16MP)
includes tracking focus
weather proofing
no shutter priority mode
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Olympus FE-4030 as a Travel photography camera
Ricoh WG-70 as a Travel photography camera
65
good MP (14MP)
built-in flash
fairly wide (26mm)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
display isn't selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f2.6)
71
weather proofing
decent MP (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (28mm)
screen is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.5)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Olympus FE-4030 Landscape photography advice
Ricoh WG-70 Landscape photography advice
32
fairly wide (26mm)
good MP (14MP)
lack of manual focus
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.6)
small screen (2.7 inch)
manual mode not available
lack of image stabilization
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
doesn't have Timelapse mode
49
manual focus
reasonably wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Digital)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
weather proofing
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inches)
no manual control
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus FE-4030 as a Vlogging camera
Ricoh WG-70 as a Vlogging camera
25
fairly wide (26mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.6)
display isn't selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
low res video (640 x 480 pxls)
doesn't have external microphone socket
33
reasonably wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Digital)
includes face detect autofocus
great video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
screen is not selfie friendly
missing microphone support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus FE-4030 vs Ricoh WG-70 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus FE-4030 and Ricoh WG-70
 Olympus FE-4030Ricoh WG-70
General Information
Company Olympus Ricoh
Model type Olympus FE-4030 Ricoh WG-70
Class Small Sensor Compact Waterproof
Introduced 2010-01-07 2020-02-04
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic III -
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.08 x 4.56mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 27.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9
Max resolution 4288 x 3216 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 1600 6400
Lowest native ISO 64 125
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points - 9
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 26-105mm (4.0x) 28-140mm (5.0x)
Largest aperture f/2.6-5.9 f/3.5-5.5
Macro focusing range 4cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.9 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.7 inch 2.7 inch
Screen resolution 230 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Min shutter speed 4 seconds 4 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 5.80 m 5.50 m (at Auto ISO)
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in On, off
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
Max video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video file format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Yes (Wireless)
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 146 grams (0.32 lb) 193 grams (0.43 lb)
Physical dimensions 93 x 56 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 300 shots
Style of battery - Battery Pack
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 seconds) Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC, Internal Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card
Card slots 1 1
Price at release $130 $280