Olympus FE-4030 vs Ricoh WG-80
95 Imaging
36 Features
21 Overall
30
91 Imaging
43 Features
35 Overall
39
Olympus FE-4030 vs Ricoh WG-80 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 146g - 93 x 56 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.70" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Launched May 2022
- Old Model is Ricoh WG-70
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus FE-4030 vs Ricoh WG-80 Overview
Below, we are matching up the Olympus FE-4030 and Ricoh WG-80, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the FE-4030 (14MP) and the WG-80 (16MP) is very similar and they enjoy the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe FE-4030 was brought out 13 years earlier than the WG-80 which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going in to a complete comparison, below is a short introduction of how the FE-4030 matches up vs the WG-80 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus FE-4030 vs Ricoh WG-80 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus FE-4030 & Ricoh WG-80. The entire galleries are available at Olympus FE-4030 Gallery & Ricoh WG-80 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4030 over the Ricoh WG-80
| FE-4030 | WG-80 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-80 over the Olympus FE-4030
| WG-80 | FE-4030 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | May 2022 |  | January 2010 | More modern by 150 months |
| Focus manually |  | Dial exact focusing |
Common features in the Olympus FE-4030 and Ricoh WG-80
| FE-4030 | WG-80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 2.7" |  | 2.70" | Identical display size |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Equal display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither features Touch display |
Olympus FE-4030 vs Ricoh WG-80 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry around your camera, you'll have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus FE-4030 enjoys external dimensions of 93mm x 56mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 146 grams (0.32 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-80 has proportions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
See the Olympus FE-4030 and Ricoh WG-80 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Below is the front view physical size comparison of the FE-4030 and the WG-80.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the FE-4030 and WG-80 is 95 and 91 respectively.
Olympus FE-4030 vs Ricoh WG-80 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor sizes just by reading technical specs. The pic underneath will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the FE-4030 and WG-80.
As you can tell, the two cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same resolution. You can expect to see the Ricoh WG-80 to offer more detail having its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The more aged FE-4030 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus FE-4030 vs Ricoh WG-80 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Olympus FE-4030 vs Ricoh WG-80 Specifications
| Olympus FE-4030 | Ricoh WG-80 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus FE-4030 | Ricoh WG-80 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2010-01-07 | 2022-05-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-105mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.6-5.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 4cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7 inch | 2.70 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.80 m | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | On, off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 146g (0.32 lbs) | 193g (0.43 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 93 x 56 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 photos |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail price | $130 | $300 |