Olympus FE-4030 vs Samsung NX300M
95 Imaging
36 Features
21 Overall
30
86 Imaging
61 Features
73 Overall
65
Olympus FE-4030 vs Samsung NX300M Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 146g - 93 x 56 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2010
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 331g - 122 x 64 x 41mm
- Introduced January 2013
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus FE-4030 vs Samsung NX300M Overview
Its time to look a little more in depth at the Olympus FE-4030 vs Samsung NX300M, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Olympus and Samsung. There exists a substantial gap among the resolutions of the FE-4030 (14MP) and NX300M (20MP) and the FE-4030 (1/2.3") and NX300M (APS-C) enjoy totally different sensor size.
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraThe FE-4030 was brought out 4 years earlier than the NX300M which is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus FE-4030 being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX300M being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving through a detailed comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the FE-4030 grades against the NX300M in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus FE-4030 vs Samsung NX300M Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus FE-4030 & Samsung NX300M. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus FE-4030 Gallery & Samsung NX300M Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4030 over the Samsung NX300M
| FE-4030 | NX300M |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung NX300M over the Olympus FE-4030
| NX300M | FE-4030 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2013 |  | January 2010 | Newer by 36 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display dimension | 3.3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.6") |
| Display resolution | 768k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+538k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus FE-4030 and Samsung NX300M
| FE-4030 | NX300M | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus FE-4030 vs Samsung NX300M Physical Comparison
In case you're going to travel with your camera, you have to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus FE-4030 features outer dimensions of 93mm x 56mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 146 grams (0.32 lbs) and the Samsung NX300M has sizing of 122mm x 64mm x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") having a weight of 331 grams (0.73 lbs).
See the Olympus FE-4030 vs Samsung NX300M in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are employing at that time. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the FE-4030 vs the NX300M.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the FE-4030 and NX300M is 95 and 86 respectively.
Olympus FE-4030 vs Samsung NX300M Sensor Comparison
Normally, its hard to envision the contrast in sensor dimensions merely by viewing a spec sheet. The pic here should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the FE-4030 and NX300M.
As you can see, each of the cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The FE-4030 featuring a smaller sensor will make getting shallow depth of field more challenging and the Samsung NX300M will result in extra detail having its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The more aged FE-4030 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus FE-4030 vs Samsung NX300M Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus FE-4030 vs Samsung NX300M Specifications
| Olympus FE-4030 | Samsung NX300M | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus FE-4030 | Samsung NX300M |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Revealed | 2010-01-07 | 2013-01-03 |
| Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III | DRIMe IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 5472 x 3648 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 247 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
| Lens focal range | 26-105mm (4.0x) | - |
| Highest aperture | f/2.6-5.9 | - |
| Macro focus range | 4cm | - |
| Amount of lenses | - | 32 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3.3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 768k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | - | Active Matrix OLED screen |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/6000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 9.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.80 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080, 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Optional |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 146g (0.32 lb) | 331g (0.73 lb) |
| Dimensions | 93 x 56 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 122 x 64 x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 330 images |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | BP1130 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $130 | $699 |