Olympus FE-4030 vs Samsung WB800F
95 Imaging
37 Features
21 Overall
30
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Olympus FE-4030 vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 146g - 93 x 56 x 22mm
- Launched January 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2013
Olympus FE-4030 vs Samsung WB800F Overview
The following is a thorough analysis of the Olympus FE-4030 versus Samsung WB800F, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the FE-4030 (14MP) and the WB800F (16MP) is fairly well matched and both cameras provide the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe FE-4030 was brought out 4 years before the WB800F which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a in-depth comparison, here is a short overview of how the FE-4030 scores against the WB800F with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus FE-4030 vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus FE-4030 & Samsung WB800F. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus FE-4030 Gallery & Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4030 over the Samsung WB800F
FE-4030 | WB800F |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Olympus FE-4030
WB800F | FE-4030 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2013 | January 2010 | Newer by 36 months | |
Manually focus | More exact focusing | |||
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus FE-4030 and Samsung WB800F
FE-4030 | WB800F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen |
Olympus FE-4030 vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
If you are looking to travel with your camera regularly, you will need to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus FE-4030 features external dimensions of 93mm x 56mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") with a weight of 146 grams (0.32 lbs) and the Samsung WB800F has measurements of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
See the Olympus FE-4030 versus Samsung WB800F in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are working with at that moment. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the FE-4030 against the WB800F.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the FE-4030 and WB800F is 95 and 92 respectively.
Olympus FE-4030 vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
Generally, its hard to envision the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by looking at technical specs. The picture here should provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the FE-4030 and WB800F.
As you can tell, each of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Samsung WB800F to give extra detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos more aggressively. The more aged FE-4030 is going to be behind in sensor technology.
Olympus FE-4030 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus FE-4030 vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
Olympus FE-4030 | Samsung WB800F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus FE-4030 | Samsung WB800F |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2010-01-07 | 2013-01-07 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 26-105mm (4.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.6-5.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 4cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 16 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | - |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 146g (0.32 pounds) | 218g (0.48 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 93 x 56 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $130 | $300 |