Olympus FE-4030 vs Sony TX66
95 Imaging
36 Features
21 Overall
30
97 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
Olympus FE-4030 vs Sony TX66 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 146g - 93 x 56 x 22mm
- Launched January 2010
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 109g - 93 x 54 x 13mm
- Released February 2012
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus FE-4030 vs Sony TX66 Overview
The following is a comprehensive comparison of the Olympus FE-4030 vs Sony TX66, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Ultracompact by brands Olympus and Sony. There exists a crucial gap among the image resolutions of the FE-4030 (14MP) and TX66 (18MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe FE-4030 was unveiled 3 years earlier than the TX66 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus FE-4030 being a Compact camera and the Sony TX66 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going in to a complete comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the FE-4030 scores vs the TX66 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus FE-4030 vs Sony TX66 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus FE-4030 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX66. The full galleries are provided at Olympus FE-4030 Gallery and Sony TX66 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4030 over the Sony TX66
| FE-4030 | TX66 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony TX66 over the Olympus FE-4030
| TX66 | FE-4030 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2012 |  | January 2010 | Newer by 26 months |
| Manually focus |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Display sizing | 3.3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.6") |
| Display resolution | 1230k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+1000k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus FE-4030 and Sony TX66
| FE-4030 | TX66 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen |
Olympus FE-4030 vs Sony TX66 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to travel with your camera, you need to factor its weight and size. The Olympus FE-4030 has got external dimensions of 93mm x 56mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 146 grams (0.32 lbs) and the Sony TX66 has specifications of 93mm x 54mm x 13mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.5") accompanied by a weight of 109 grams (0.24 lbs).
Check the Olympus FE-4030 vs Sony TX66 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the FE-4030 vs the TX66.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the FE-4030 and TX66 is 95 and 97 respectively.
Olympus FE-4030 vs Sony TX66 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's tough to picture the gap in sensor dimensions merely by seeing a spec sheet. The image here should offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the FE-4030 and TX66.
As you can see, both cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different megapixels. You should anticipate the Sony TX66 to provide extra detail having an extra 4MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos far more aggressively. The more aged FE-4030 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus FE-4030 vs Sony TX66 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus FE-4030 vs Sony TX66 Specifications
| Olympus FE-4030 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX66 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus FE-4030 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX66 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2010-01-07 | 2012-02-28 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III | BIONZ |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 18 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-105mm (4.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.6-5.9 | f/3.5-4.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 4cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 3.3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 1,230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | - | XtraFine TruBlack OLED display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.80 m | 3.10 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Rear Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 146 grams (0.32 lbs) | 109 grams (0.24 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 93 x 56 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 93 x 54 x 13mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 250 photographs |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | NP-BN |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo, microSD/microSDHC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $130 | $350 |