Olympus FE-45 vs Ricoh GR
95 Imaging
32 Features
14 Overall
24
90 Imaging
57 Features
54 Overall
55
Olympus FE-45 vs Ricoh GR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-108mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 142g - 94 x 62 x 23mm
- Released January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8) lens
- 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
- Announced April 2013
- Later Model is Ricoh GR II
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus FE-45 vs Ricoh GR Overview
Lets look more closely at the Olympus FE-45 and Ricoh GR, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a sizeable gap between the resolutions of the FE-45 (10MP) and GR (16MP) and the FE-45 (1/2.3") and GR (APS-C) use totally different sensor measurements.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe FE-45 was released 5 years earlier than the GR which is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus FE-45 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GR being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before delving in to a in depth comparison, below is a short view of how the FE-45 scores versus the GR for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus FE-45 vs Ricoh GR Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus FE-45 and Ricoh GR. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus FE-45 Gallery and Ricoh GR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-45 over the Ricoh GR
| FE-45 | GR |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Olympus FE-45
| GR | FE-45 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | April 2013 | January 2009 | More modern by 52 months | |
| Manual focus | Very precise focusing | |||
| Screen dimension | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
| Screen resolution | 1230k | 230k | Sharper screen (+1000k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus FE-45 and Ricoh GR
| FE-45 | GR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Lacking Touch screen |
Olympus FE-45 vs Ricoh GR Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry around your camera, you'll need to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus FE-45 offers outer dimensions of 94mm x 62mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 142 grams (0.31 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GR has measurements of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus FE-45 and Ricoh GR in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have chosen at the time. Following is the front view size comparison of the FE-45 against the GR.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the FE-45 and GR is 95 and 90 respectively.
Olympus FE-45 vs Ricoh GR Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's difficult to visualise the difference between sensor sizes purely by checking technical specs. The picture underneath will provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the FE-45 and GR.
As you have seen, both cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The FE-45 due to its tinier sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field trickier and the Ricoh GR will give extra detail as a result of its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The more aged FE-45 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Olympus FE-45 vs Ricoh GR Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus FE-45 vs Ricoh GR Specifications
| Olympus FE-45 | Ricoh GR | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus FE-45 | Ricoh GR |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2009-01-07 | 2013-04-17 |
| Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 372.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4928 x 3264 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 36-108mm (3.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.5" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 230k dots | 1,230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 300 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 4.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 5.40 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/4000 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 142g (0.31 pounds) | 245g (0.54 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 94 x 62 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 78 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.6 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.5 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 972 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 290 pictures |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | DB65 |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | xD-Picture Card, microSD, internal | SD, SDHC, SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $130 | $971 |