Olympus FE-45 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV
95 Imaging
33 Features
14 Overall
25
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c2fd8/c2fd8cb3ada58200fb69fb61535ed1c18469bce6" alt="Olympus FE-45 front Olympus FE-45 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/66cf9/66cf9a75906dc0e9f2d3d249d34bb9f3f9d5798c" alt="Ricoh GR Digital IV front Ricoh GR Digital IV front"
92 Imaging
35 Features
47 Overall
39
Olympus FE-45 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-108mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 142g - 94 x 62 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Released September 2011
- Old Model is Ricoh GR Digital III
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus FE-45 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Overview
Let's look more in depth at the Olympus FE-45 and Ricoh GR Digital IV, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by brands Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the FE-45 (10MP) and the GR Digital IV (10MP) is relatively close but the FE-45 (1/2.3") and GR Digital IV (1/1.7") boast totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The FE-45 was announced 3 years prior to the GR Digital IV which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a in-depth comparison, here is a quick view of how the FE-45 grades versus the GR Digital IV with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus FE-45 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus FE-45 & Ricoh GR Digital IV. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus FE-45 Gallery & Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-45 over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
FE-45 | GR Digital IV |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Olympus FE-45
GR Digital IV | FE-45 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2011 | ![]() | January 2009 | More modern by 32 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 1230k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+1000k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus FE-45 and Ricoh GR Digital IV
FE-45 | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither provides Touch friendly screen |
Olympus FE-45 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry around your camera regularly, you'll need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus FE-45 provides external dimensions of 94mm x 62mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 142 grams (0.31 lbs) and the Ricoh GR Digital IV has proportions of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") and a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus FE-45 and Ricoh GR Digital IV in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you use at that time. Following is a front view measurements comparison of the FE-45 and the GR Digital IV.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7d4ec/7d4ecfdc7c0786f00e3295146b77570b4f17cc93" alt="Olympus FE-45 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV size comparison Olympus FE-45 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the FE-45 and GR Digital IV is 95 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2a043/2a043f71528c9a5a9a6cdb5f344c47619295bda0" alt="Olympus FE-45 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV top view buttons comparison Olympus FE-45 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV top view buttons comparison"
Olympus FE-45 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be hard to envision the gap in sensor sizes purely by looking through specs. The image below will help give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the FE-45 and GR Digital IV.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras provide the same MP albeit not the same sensor sizes. The FE-45 comes with the smaller sensor which will make getting shallower depth of field more difficult. The more aged FE-45 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e4a12/e4a12e452e565477e5dadadb7766dbbd94048f91" alt="Olympus FE-45 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV sensor size comparison Olympus FE-45 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV sensor size comparison"
Olympus FE-45 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/10ab7/10ab7221865b61770152f410bc8f13deae7a2843" alt="Olympus FE-45 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus FE-45 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus FE-45 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Specifications
Olympus FE-45 | Ricoh GR Digital IV | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus FE-45 | Ricoh GR Digital IV |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2009-01-07 | 2011-09-15 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 36-108mm (3.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/1.9 |
Macro focus range | 5cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 230k dots | 1,230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 1 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 3.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 142 gr (0.31 pounds) | 190 gr (0.42 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 94 x 62 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 390 photographs |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | DB65 |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | xD-Picture Card, microSD, internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail pricing | $130 | $599 |