Olympus FE-45 vs Ricoh WG-20
95 Imaging
32 Features
14 Overall
24
93 Imaging
38 Features
36 Overall
37
Olympus FE-45 vs Ricoh WG-20 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-108mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 142g - 94 x 62 x 23mm
- Released January 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 164g - 114 x 58 x 28mm
- Released February 2014
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus FE-45 vs Ricoh WG-20 Overview
Here, we are evaluating the Olympus FE-45 versus Ricoh WG-20, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by companies Olympus and Ricoh. There is a large difference among the sensor resolutions of the FE-45 (10MP) and WG-20 (14MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe FE-45 was unveiled 6 years before the WG-20 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a in depth comparison, here is a short view of how the FE-45 matches up against the WG-20 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Olympus FE-45 vs Ricoh WG-20 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus FE-45 & Ricoh WG-20. The full galleries are provided at Olympus FE-45 Gallery & Ricoh WG-20 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-45 over the Ricoh WG-20
| FE-45 | WG-20 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-20 over the Olympus FE-45
| WG-20 | FE-45 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2014 | January 2009 | Newer by 61 months | |
| Focus manually | Very accurate focus | |||
| Display size | 2.7" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Common features in the Olympus FE-45 and Ricoh WG-20
| FE-45 | WG-20 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Exact same display resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Neither has Touch display |
Olympus FE-45 vs Ricoh WG-20 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to travel with your camera frequently, you'll need to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus FE-45 has outer measurements of 94mm x 62mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 142 grams (0.31 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-20 has measurements of 114mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 164 grams (0.36 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus FE-45 versus Ricoh WG-20 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising at that moment. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the FE-45 against the WG-20.

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the FE-45 and WG-20 is 95 and 93 respectively.
Olympus FE-45 vs Ricoh WG-20 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its tough to envision the contrast in sensor dimensions merely by checking out technical specs. The picture below might give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the FE-45 and WG-20.
As you have seen, both of the cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same resolution. You can expect to see the Ricoh WG-20 to produce more detail having an extra 4MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images way more aggressively. The more aged FE-45 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus FE-45 vs Ricoh WG-20 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus FE-45 vs Ricoh WG-20 Specifications
| Olympus FE-45 | Ricoh WG-20 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus FE-45 | Ricoh WG-20 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2009-01-07 | 2014-02-05 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 36-108mm (3.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.5" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30p, 15p), 640 x 480 (30p, 15p), 320 x 240 (30p, 15p) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 142 gr (0.31 lb) | 164 gr (0.36 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 94 x 62 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 114 x 58 x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 260 pictures |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | xD-Picture Card, microSD, internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $130 | $370 |