Olympus FE-45 vs Ricoh WG-80
95 Imaging
32 Features
14 Overall
24
91 Imaging
43 Features
35 Overall
39
Olympus FE-45 vs Ricoh WG-80 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-108mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 142g - 94 x 62 x 23mm
- Launched January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.70" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Announced May 2022
- Superseded the Ricoh WG-70
Photography Glossary Olympus FE-45 vs Ricoh WG-80 Overview
Let's look a bit more in depth at the Olympus FE-45 versus Ricoh WG-80, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a noticeable gap among the resolutions of the FE-45 (10MP) and WG-80 (16MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe FE-45 was released 14 years before the WG-80 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the FE-45 grades versus the WG-80 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Olympus FE-45 vs Ricoh WG-80 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus FE-45 & Ricoh WG-80. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus FE-45 Gallery & Ricoh WG-80 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-45 over the Ricoh WG-80
| FE-45 | WG-80 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-80 over the Olympus FE-45
| WG-80 | FE-45 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | May 2022 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 162 months |
| Manual focus |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Screen dimensions | 2.70" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Common features in the Olympus FE-45 and Ricoh WG-80
| FE-45 | WG-80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Olympus FE-45 vs Ricoh WG-80 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry around your camera, you'll need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus FE-45 features outside dimensions of 94mm x 62mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 142 grams (0.31 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-80 has dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus FE-45 versus Ricoh WG-80 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have attached at that moment. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the FE-45 and the WG-80.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the FE-45 and WG-80 is 95 and 91 respectively.
Olympus FE-45 vs Ricoh WG-80 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very hard to picture the gap in sensor sizes just by researching specs. The pic here will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the FE-45 and WG-80.
All in all, both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Ricoh WG-80 to render extra detail as a result of its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots more aggressively. The more aged FE-45 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus FE-45 vs Ricoh WG-80 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus FE-45 vs Ricoh WG-80 Specifications
| Olympus FE-45 | Ricoh WG-80 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus FE-45 | Ricoh WG-80 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2009-01-07 | 2022-05-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 36-108mm (3.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.5 inches | 2.70 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | On, off |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 142g (0.31 pounds) | 193g (0.43 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 94 x 62 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 shots |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | xD-Picture Card, microSD, internal | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail pricing | $130 | $300 |