Olympus FE-45 vs Ricoh WG-80
95 Imaging
33 Features
14 Overall
25
91 Imaging
44 Features
35 Overall
40
Olympus FE-45 vs Ricoh WG-80 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-108mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 142g - 94 x 62 x 23mm
- Launched January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.70" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Announced May 2022
- Superseded the Ricoh WG-70
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus FE-45 vs Ricoh WG-80 Overview
Let's look a bit more in depth at the Olympus FE-45 versus Ricoh WG-80, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a noticeable gap among the resolutions of the FE-45 (10MP) and WG-80 (16MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe FE-45 was released 14 years before the WG-80 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the FE-45 grades versus the WG-80 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus FE-45 vs Ricoh WG-80 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus FE-45 & Ricoh WG-80. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus FE-45 Gallery & Ricoh WG-80 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-45 over the Ricoh WG-80
| FE-45 | WG-80 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-80 over the Olympus FE-45
| WG-80 | FE-45 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | May 2022 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 162 months |
| Manual focus |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Screen dimensions | 2.70" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Common features in the Olympus FE-45 and Ricoh WG-80
| FE-45 | WG-80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Olympus FE-45 vs Ricoh WG-80 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry around your camera, you'll need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus FE-45 features outside dimensions of 94mm x 62mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 142 grams (0.31 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-80 has dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus FE-45 versus Ricoh WG-80 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have attached at that moment. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the FE-45 and the WG-80.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the FE-45 and WG-80 is 95 and 91 respectively.
Olympus FE-45 vs Ricoh WG-80 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very hard to picture the gap in sensor sizes just by researching specs. The pic here will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the FE-45 and WG-80.
All in all, both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Ricoh WG-80 to render extra detail as a result of its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots more aggressively. The more aged FE-45 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus FE-45 vs Ricoh WG-80 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Olympus FE-45 vs Ricoh WG-80 Specifications
| Olympus FE-45 | Ricoh WG-80 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus FE-45 | Ricoh WG-80 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2009-01-07 | 2022-05-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 36-108mm (3.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.5 inches | 2.70 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | On, off |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 142g (0.31 pounds) | 193g (0.43 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 94 x 62 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 shots |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | xD-Picture Card, microSD, internal | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail pricing | $130 | $300 |