Olympus FE-45 vs Sony A390
95 Imaging
33 Features
14 Overall
25
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c2fd8/c2fd8cb3ada58200fb69fb61535ed1c18469bce6" alt="Olympus FE-45 front Olympus FE-45 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cc9a0/cc9a0ca2125609e674d299e5b8108d0775ff4eee" alt="Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 front Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 front"
66 Imaging
54 Features
54 Overall
54
Olympus FE-45 vs Sony A390 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-108mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 142g - 94 x 62 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 549g - 128 x 97 x 86mm
- Launched July 2010
- Succeeded the Sony A380
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus FE-45 vs Sony A390 Overview
On this page, we will be evaluating the Olympus FE-45 vs Sony A390, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by companies Olympus and Sony. There exists a substantial gap between the image resolutions of the FE-45 (10MP) and A390 (14MP) and the FE-45 (1/2.3") and A390 (APS-C) have different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The FE-45 was brought out 18 months prior to the A390 which makes them a generation away from one another. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus FE-45 being a Compact camera and the Sony A390 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before going straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief summary of how the FE-45 scores vs the A390 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus FE-45 vs Sony A390 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus FE-45 & Sony Alpha DSLR-A390. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus FE-45 Gallery & Sony A390 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-45 over the Sony A390
FE-45 | A390 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony A390 over the Olympus FE-45
A390 | FE-45 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | July 2010 | ![]() | January 2009 | Newer by 18 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen dimensions | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Common features in the Olympus FE-45 and Sony A390
FE-45 | A390 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Exact same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Lack of Touch screen |
Olympus FE-45 vs Sony A390 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to travel with your camera frequently, you'll have to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus FE-45 has got outside dimensions of 94mm x 62mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 142 grams (0.31 lbs) while the Sony A390 has sizing of 128mm x 97mm x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") having a weight of 549 grams (1.21 lbs).
Look at the Olympus FE-45 vs Sony A390 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the FE-45 versus the A390.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e55aa/e55aac9d94f52fec925cd07b088c5c97da46bf5b" alt="Olympus FE-45 vs Sony A390 size comparison Olympus FE-45 vs Sony A390 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the FE-45 and A390 is 95 and 66 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4aa3c/4aa3c378d18d5065ce823382b621f3431f7356c6" alt="Olympus FE-45 vs Sony A390 top view buttons comparison Olympus FE-45 vs Sony A390 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus FE-45 vs Sony A390 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by reviewing specifications. The picture here may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the FE-45 and A390.
Plainly, both the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The FE-45 featuring a tinier sensor is going to make shooting bokeh more difficult and the Sony A390 will offer greater detail having its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The more aged FE-45 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a673a/a673a3d5fd1fb7bccd43ff5b0ea8595e2bc52af9" alt="Olympus FE-45 vs Sony A390 sensor size comparison Olympus FE-45 vs Sony A390 sensor size comparison"
Olympus FE-45 vs Sony A390 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/232d8/232d870293dd72c70a5fe318d2513c679343f4f6" alt="Olympus FE-45 vs Sony A390 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus FE-45 vs Sony A390 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus FE-45 vs Sony A390 Specifications
Olympus FE-45 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus FE-45 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level DSLR |
Introduced | 2009-01-07 | 2010-07-28 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4592 x 3056 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens focal range | 36-108mm (3.0x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | - |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 2.5 inches | 2.7 inches |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.49x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | None |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 142g (0.31 pounds) | 549g (1.21 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 94 x 62 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 128 x 97 x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 66 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.5 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.5 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 607 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 230 shots |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | NP-FH50 |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | xD-Picture Card, microSD, internal | SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $130 | $500 |