Olympus FE-5010 vs Olympus E-PL2
96 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d7eb5/d7eb58ad0dd4eba3b999b824f84ce7ac6eb35d7c" alt="Olympus FE-5010 front Olympus FE-5010 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0db25/0db25b50f5db0e38bf19b46696bb0e06a463d704" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL2 front Olympus PEN E-PL2 front"
85 Imaging
47 Features
47 Overall
47
Olympus FE-5010 vs Olympus E-PL2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-180mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 130g - 96 x 57 x 21mm
- Announced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 362g - 114 x 72 x 42mm
- Launched February 2011
- Superseded the Olympus E-PL1s
- Replacement is Olympus E-PL3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus FE-5010 vs Olympus E-PL2 Overview
On this page, we will be evaluating the Olympus FE-5010 vs Olympus E-PL2, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and both are produced by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the FE-5010 (12MP) and the E-PL2 (12MP) is relatively well matched but the FE-5010 (1/2.3") and E-PL2 (Four Thirds) boast totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The FE-5010 was manufactured 3 years earlier than the E-PL2 and that is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus FE-5010 being a Compact camera and the Olympus E-PL2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving into a detailed comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the FE-5010 scores vs the E-PL2 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus FE-5010 vs Olympus E-PL2 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus FE-5010 and Olympus PEN E-PL2. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus FE-5010 Gallery and Olympus E-PL2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5010 over the Olympus E-PL2
FE-5010 | E-PL2 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL2 over the Olympus FE-5010
E-PL2 | FE-5010 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2011 | ![]() | January 2009 | More recent by 25 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus FE-5010 and Olympus E-PL2
FE-5010 | E-PL2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Olympus FE-5010 vs Olympus E-PL2 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you're going to have to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus FE-5010 comes with physical dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 130 grams (0.29 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-PL2 has sizing of 114mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") having a weight of 362 grams (0.80 lbs).
Check out the Olympus FE-5010 vs Olympus E-PL2 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Here is a front view over all size comparison of the FE-5010 compared to the E-PL2.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0904b/0904b2292f2a24cc840ecfebe06e2ac289e0c209" alt="Olympus FE-5010 vs Olympus E-PL2 size comparison Olympus FE-5010 vs Olympus E-PL2 size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the FE-5010 and E-PL2 is 96 and 85 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ffadd/ffadd3456eb33c88e1404d1c1543e686c06d1085" alt="Olympus FE-5010 vs Olympus E-PL2 top view buttons comparison Olympus FE-5010 vs Olympus E-PL2 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus FE-5010 vs Olympus E-PL2 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its hard to envision the gap between sensor measurements only by checking specs. The graphic below might give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the FE-5010 and E-PL2.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras provide the same resolution albeit not the same sensor measurements. The FE-5010 has got the tinier sensor which should make obtaining shallow depth of field more difficult. The older FE-5010 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/78cc5/78cc5ffd6d007e69c0d68db866b481ccf132f18b" alt="Olympus FE-5010 vs Olympus E-PL2 sensor size comparison Olympus FE-5010 vs Olympus E-PL2 sensor size comparison"
Olympus FE-5010 vs Olympus E-PL2 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a4218/a4218d13ca248a09236cb7d5b483a5dba2143771" alt="Olympus FE-5010 vs Olympus E-PL2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus FE-5010 vs Olympus E-PL2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus FE-5010 vs Olympus E-PL2 Specifications
Olympus FE-5010 | Olympus PEN E-PL2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus FE-5010 | Olympus PEN E-PL2 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2009-01-07 | 2011-02-11 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Truepic V |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4032 x 3024 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens focal range | 36-180mm (5.0x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | - |
Macro focus distance | 3cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | - | HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 3.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | 10.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | - | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 130 grams (0.29 lbs) | 362 grams (0.80 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 96 x 57 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 114 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 55 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 21.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.2 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 573 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 280 pictures |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-42B | BLS-5 |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | xD-Picture Card (1GB, 2GB), microSD (MASD-1 is required) | SD/SDHC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $130 | $0 |