Olympus FE-5010 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS
Portability
96 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
96 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
Portability
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
Olympus FE-5010 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Key Specs
Olympus FE-5010
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-180mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 130g - 96 x 57 x 21mm
- Launched January 2009
Olympus TG-820 iHS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Released February 2012
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus FE-5010 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Overview
Lets take a more detailed look at the Olympus FE-5010 and Olympus TG-820 iHS, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof and they are both produced by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the FE-5010 (12MP) and the TG-820 iHS (12MP) is pretty similar and they possess the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe FE-5010 was introduced 4 years earlier than the TG-820 iHS which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a in depth comparison, below is a short view of how the FE-5010 scores vs the TG-820 iHS with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus FE-5010 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus FE-5010 & Olympus TG-820 iHS. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus FE-5010 Gallery & Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5010 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
| FE-5010 | TG-820 iHS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Olympus FE-5010
| TG-820 iHS | FE-5010 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2012 |  | January 2009 | Newer by 37 months |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 1030k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+800k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus FE-5010 and Olympus TG-820 iHS
| FE-5010 | TG-820 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Olympus FE-5010 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to travel with your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus FE-5010 offers outer dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.8") with a weight of 130 grams (0.29 lbs) while the Olympus TG-820 iHS has measurements of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Look at the Olympus FE-5010 and Olympus TG-820 iHS in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you choose during that time. Here is the front view dimensions comparison of the FE-5010 versus the TG-820 iHS.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the FE-5010 and TG-820 iHS is 96 and 92 respectively.
Olympus FE-5010 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be tough to imagine the gap between sensor dimensions only by going over specs. The image here will give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the FE-5010 and TG-820 iHS.
All in all, both cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the exact same resolution so you can expect similar quality of photographs but you might want to factor the age of the products into consideration. The more aged FE-5010 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus FE-5010 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus FE-5010 Portrait photography factors
Olympus TG-820 iHS Portrait photography factors
focusing manually not possible
lack of manual mode
external flash not possible
low MP (12MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
supports face detect focusing
lack of manual focus
no manual mode
external flash not possible
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Olympus FE-5010 Street photography info
Olympus TG-820 iHS Street photography info
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proof
lighter than competitors in class (130 grams)
no articulating screen
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather sealing
no articulating screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Olympus FE-5010 Sports photography information
Olympus TG-820 iHS Sports photography information
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proof
no shutter priority mode
low MP (12MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports tracking focus
weather sealing
slow continuous shooting (5.0 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor resolution low (12MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
bad battery power (220 CIPA)
no phase detect AF
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Olympus FE-5010 Travel photography information
Olympus TG-820 iHS Travel photography information
lighter than competitors in class (130 grams)
environment proof
has built in flash
does not have Timelapse recording
low MP (12 megapixels)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
wide angle not great (36mm)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
weather sealing
flash built-in
pretty wide (28mm)
does not have Time Lapse function
bad battery power (220 CIPA)
sensor resolution low (12MP)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f3.9)
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Olympus FE-5010 Landscape photography details
Olympus TG-820 iHS Landscape photography details
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proof
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (36mm)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
tiny screen (2.7 inch)
lack of manual mode
low MP (12 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
does not have Timelapse recording
pretty wide (28mm)
decent sized screen (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather sealing
lack of manual focus
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.9)
no manual mode
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
bad battery power (220 shots)
does not have Time Lapse function
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Olympus FE-5010 Vlogging details
Olympus TG-820 iHS Vlogging details
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competitors in class (130g)
wide angle not great (36mm)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
low res video (640 x 480 pixels)
does not have microphone port
pretty wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detect focusing
good video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
sluggish max aperture (f3.9)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
does not have mic socket
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus FE-5010 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Specifications
| Olympus FE-5010 | Olympus TG-820 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus FE-5010 | Olympus TG-820 iHS |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2009-01-07 | 2012-02-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | TruePic VI |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 36-180mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 3cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 1,030 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | - | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 130 grams (0.29 lbs) | 206 grams (0.45 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 96 x 57 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 220 images |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-42B | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | xD-Picture Card (1GB, 2GB), microSD (MASD-1 is required) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $130 | $500 |