Olympus FE-5010 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS
96 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
Olympus FE-5010 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-180mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 130g - 96 x 57 x 21mm
- Launched January 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Released February 2012
Olympus FE-5010 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Overview
Lets take a more detailed look at the Olympus FE-5010 and Olympus TG-820 iHS, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof and they are both produced by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the FE-5010 (12MP) and the TG-820 iHS (12MP) is pretty similar and they possess the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe FE-5010 was introduced 4 years earlier than the TG-820 iHS which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a in depth comparison, below is a short view of how the FE-5010 scores vs the TG-820 iHS with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus FE-5010 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus FE-5010 & Olympus TG-820 iHS. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus FE-5010 Gallery & Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5010 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
FE-5010 | TG-820 iHS |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Olympus FE-5010
TG-820 iHS | FE-5010 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2012 | January 2009 | Newer by 37 months | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 1030k | 230k | Clearer screen (+800k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus FE-5010 and Olympus TG-820 iHS
FE-5010 | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Lack of manual focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Olympus FE-5010 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to travel with your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus FE-5010 offers outer dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.8") with a weight of 130 grams (0.29 lbs) while the Olympus TG-820 iHS has measurements of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Look at the Olympus FE-5010 and Olympus TG-820 iHS in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you choose during that time. Here is the front view dimensions comparison of the FE-5010 versus the TG-820 iHS.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the FE-5010 and TG-820 iHS is 96 and 92 respectively.
Olympus FE-5010 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be tough to imagine the gap between sensor dimensions only by going over specs. The image here will give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the FE-5010 and TG-820 iHS.
All in all, both cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the exact same resolution so you can expect similar quality of photographs but you might want to factor the age of the products into consideration. The more aged FE-5010 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus FE-5010 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus FE-5010 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Specifications
Olympus FE-5010 | Olympus TG-820 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus FE-5010 | Olympus TG-820 iHS |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Launched | 2009-01-07 | 2012-02-08 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | TruePic VI |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 36-180mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 3cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 1,030 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | - | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | 3.50 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 130 grams (0.29 lbs) | 206 grams (0.45 lbs) |
Dimensions | 96 x 57 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 220 images |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-42B | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | xD-Picture Card (1GB, 2GB), microSD (MASD-1 is required) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $130 | $500 |