Olympus FE-5010 vs Panasonic 3D1
96 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
93 Imaging
36 Features
36 Overall
36
Olympus FE-5010 vs Panasonic 3D1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-180mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 130g - 96 x 57 x 21mm
- Revealed January 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F3.9-5.7) lens
- 193g - 108 x 58 x 24mm
- Introduced November 2011
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus FE-5010 vs Panasonic 3D1 Overview
In this article, we will be analyzing the Olympus FE-5010 versus Panasonic 3D1, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the FE-5010 (12MP) and the 3D1 (12MP) is pretty comparable and they use the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe FE-5010 was introduced 3 years prior to the 3D1 which is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a complete comparison, below is a short summation of how the FE-5010 grades vs the 3D1 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Olympus FE-5010 vs Panasonic 3D1 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus FE-5010 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-3D1. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus FE-5010 Gallery and Panasonic 3D1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5010 over the Panasonic 3D1
| FE-5010 | 3D1 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic 3D1 over the Olympus FE-5010
| 3D1 | FE-5010 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | November 2011 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 34 months |
| Screen sizing | 3.5" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.8") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus FE-5010 and Panasonic 3D1
| FE-5010 | 3D1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus FE-5010 vs Panasonic 3D1 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry around your camera frequently, you need to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus FE-5010 enjoys physical measurements of 96mm x 57mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 130 grams (0.29 lbs) and the Panasonic 3D1 has sizing of 108mm x 58mm x 24mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Compare the Olympus FE-5010 versus Panasonic 3D1 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have attached during that time. Following is the front view over all size comparison of the FE-5010 vs the 3D1.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the FE-5010 and 3D1 is 96 and 93 respectively.
Olympus FE-5010 vs Panasonic 3D1 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is tough to visualise the difference in sensor sizes purely by going through specifications. The pic here may provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the FE-5010 and 3D1.
To sum up, the two cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the same exact resolution and you should expect comparable quality of images but you will need to take the release date of the cameras into account. The more aged FE-5010 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus FE-5010 vs Panasonic 3D1 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus FE-5010 vs Panasonic 3D1 Specifications
| Olympus FE-5010 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-3D1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model type | Olympus FE-5010 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-3D1 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2009-01-07 | 2011-11-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 23 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 36-180mm (5.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | f/3.9-5.7 |
| Macro focusing distance | 3cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7 inch | 3.5 inch |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT Full Touch Screen with AR coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1300s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 130 gr (0.29 lbs) | 193 gr (0.43 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 96 x 57 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 108 x 58 x 24mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 200 pictures |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-42B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | xD-Picture Card (1GB, 2GB), microSD (MASD-1 is required) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $130 | $670 |