Olympus FE-5010 vs Ricoh CX1
96 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d7eb5/d7eb58ad0dd4eba3b999b824f84ce7ac6eb35d7c" alt="Olympus FE-5010 front Olympus FE-5010 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dc791/dc791c379c416f050f2a7563d8e9c10fefab17d4" alt="Ricoh CX1 front Ricoh CX1 front"
93 Imaging
32 Features
30 Overall
31
Olympus FE-5010 vs Ricoh CX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-180mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 130g - 96 x 57 x 21mm
- Announced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-200mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
- 180g - 102 x 58 x 28mm
- Revealed February 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus FE-5010 vs Ricoh CX1 Overview
Lets look much closer at the Olympus FE-5010 vs Ricoh CX1, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by companies Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a sizable gap between the sensor resolutions of the FE-5010 (12MP) and CX1 (9MP) but they use the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The FE-5010 was revealed within a month of the CX1 so they are of a similar age. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the FE-5010 matches up vs the CX1 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus FE-5010 vs Ricoh CX1 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus FE-5010 & Ricoh CX1. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus FE-5010 Gallery & Ricoh CX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5010 over the Ricoh CX1
FE-5010 | CX1 |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX1 over the Olympus FE-5010
CX1 | FE-5010 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus FE-5010 and Ricoh CX1
FE-5010 | CX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2009 | ![]() | February 2009 | Similar age |
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither provides Touch screen |
Olympus FE-5010 vs Ricoh CX1 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you will have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus FE-5010 provides outer measurements of 96mm x 57mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.8") with a weight of 130 grams (0.29 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX1 has measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 180 grams (0.40 lbs).
Check out the Olympus FE-5010 vs Ricoh CX1 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you select at the time. Underneath is the front view overall size comparison of the FE-5010 against the CX1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eb502/eb5020dd4097d45e555ab20886969b8fbaf86c65" alt="Olympus FE-5010 vs Ricoh CX1 size comparison Olympus FE-5010 vs Ricoh CX1 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the FE-5010 and CX1 is 96 and 93 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3a6eb/3a6eb4fe1275490c77bf1d8f3998baeabf2faed1" alt="Olympus FE-5010 vs Ricoh CX1 top view buttons comparison Olympus FE-5010 vs Ricoh CX1 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus FE-5010 vs Ricoh CX1 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is hard to imagine the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by looking at technical specs. The picture here should give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the FE-5010 and CX1.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different resolution. You can expect the Olympus FE-5010 to give extra detail because of its extra 3 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs far more aggressively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ab40c/ab40c28533ad525b4e1f9e39c37fcb8d460293ea" alt="Olympus FE-5010 vs Ricoh CX1 sensor size comparison Olympus FE-5010 vs Ricoh CX1 sensor size comparison"
Olympus FE-5010 vs Ricoh CX1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/94d5b/94d5b836e2c9d3eeb66c354c42a67ad20db834e2" alt="Olympus FE-5010 vs Ricoh CX1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus FE-5010 vs Ricoh CX1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus FE-5010 vs Ricoh CX1 Specifications
Olympus FE-5010 | Ricoh CX1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus FE-5010 | Ricoh CX1 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2009-01-07 | 2009-02-19 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 9 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3456 x 2592 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 36-180mm (5.0x) | 28-200mm (7.1x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | f/3.3-5.2 |
Macro focusing range | 3cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | 3.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 130g (0.29 lbs) | 180g (0.40 lbs) |
Dimensions | 96 x 57 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 102 x 58 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | LI-42B | DB-70 |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | xD-Picture Card (1GB, 2GB), microSD (MASD-1 is required) | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $130 | $299 |