Olympus FE-5010 vs Ricoh WG-6
96 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
89 Imaging
46 Features
46 Overall
46
Olympus FE-5010 vs Ricoh WG-6 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-180mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 130g - 96 x 57 x 21mm
- Released January 2009
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 246g - 118 x 66 x 33mm
- Released February 2018
- Earlier Model is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus FE-5010 vs Ricoh WG-6 Overview
In this write-up, we will be matching up the Olympus FE-5010 vs Ricoh WG-6, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. There is a substantial difference between the sensor resolutions of the FE-5010 (12MP) and WG-6 (20MP) but they use the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe FE-5010 was unveiled 10 years earlier than the WG-6 and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a full comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the FE-5010 scores vs the WG-6 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus FE-5010 vs Ricoh WG-6 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus FE-5010 & Ricoh WG-6. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus FE-5010 Gallery & Ricoh WG-6 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5010 over the Ricoh WG-6
| FE-5010 | WG-6 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-6 over the Olympus FE-5010
| WG-6 | FE-5010 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2018 |  | January 2009 | More recent by 111 months |
| Manual focus |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 1040k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+810k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus FE-5010 and Ricoh WG-6
| FE-5010 | WG-6 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Olympus FE-5010 vs Ricoh WG-6 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to lug around your camera regularly, you have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus FE-5010 has got physical measurements of 96mm x 57mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.8") with a weight of 130 grams (0.29 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-6 has measurements of 118mm x 66mm x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") with a weight of 246 grams (0.54 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus FE-5010 vs Ricoh WG-6 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you choose at that time. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the FE-5010 vs the WG-6.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the FE-5010 and WG-6 is 96 and 89 respectively.
Olympus FE-5010 vs Ricoh WG-6 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is difficult to envision the gap between sensor measurements just by looking at a spec sheet. The graphic below will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the FE-5010 and WG-6.
As you can see, both cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Ricoh WG-6 to give you extra detail having an extra 8MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop pictures far more aggressively. The older FE-5010 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus FE-5010 vs Ricoh WG-6 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus FE-5010 vs Ricoh WG-6 Specifications
| Olympus FE-5010 | Ricoh WG-6 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus FE-5010 | Ricoh WG-6 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2009-01-07 | 2018-02-21 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 36-180mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 1,040 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | 5.50 m (with Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Flash on, flash off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 3840x2160 |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Supports FlashAir SD cards |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | DB-110 lithium-ion battery & USB charger |
| GPS | None | Built-in |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 130 grams (0.29 lbs) | 246 grams (0.54 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 96 x 57 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 118 x 66 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 340 photos |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-42B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | xD-Picture Card (1GB, 2GB), microSD (MASD-1 is required) | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $130 | $271 |