Olympus FE-5010 vs Sony Cyber-shot HX1: An Exhaustive Comparison for Informed Photographers

Selecting a camera that aligns with your specific photographic ambitions requires understanding more than specs on paper. Drawing from direct field testing, years of hardware evaluations, and practical workflow analysis, this article presents a comprehensive technical and usability comparison of two compact cameras from the 2009 era: the Olympus FE-5010 and the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX1 (HX1). Both cameras target enthusiast-level users who value portability but differ substantially in design, feature sets, and ergonomic philosophies.

This deep-dive covers sensor performance, optics, autofocus, build, interface, image quality, and use case suitability across diverse photography genres. Our goal is to equip you with actionable insights to navigate these cameras’ technical nuances and real-world behavior, helping you pinpoint their strengths, weaknesses, and ultimately, which model fits your precise needs.

Physical Dimensions and Handling: Compact Convenience vs Bridge Rigidity

One of the initial tangible differences confronting users is the form factor. The Olympus FE-5010 is a classic ultra-compact, consumer-friendly pocket camera with minimal manual controls. Measuring 96x57x21 mm and weighing a mere 130 grams, it epitomizes portability. This slim profile makes it ideal for casual travel, street shooting, or anyone prioritizing an unobtrusive device.

In contrast, the Sony HX1 exhibits a distinctly larger SLR-style bridge camera form at 115x83x92 mm and weighs 544 grams, more than quadruple the FE-5010’s mass. While notably less pocketable, the HX1’s size accommodates a more substantial grip, dedicated dials, and an integrated electronic viewfinder (EVF), enhancing control precision and stability - critical benefits in challenging lighting or active shooting conditions.

Ergonomically, the Sony’s larger body facilitates one-hand operation of zoom and shutter controls but may fatigue users during extended handheld sessions without support. The Olympus, while easily carried anywhere, suffers from limited grip, complicating steadiness, especially at telephoto focal lengths.

Control Layout and Interface: Manual Flexibility vs Simplified Operation

Olympus FE-5010 prioritizes simplicity. The camera offers no manual focus, shutter priority, aperture priority, or exposure compensation modes, relegating users to full auto or basic scene selections. Physical controls are minimal, and the interface lacks illuminated buttons or hotshoe flash options, limiting creative input. A fixed 2.7" low-resolution LCD with no tilting capability further restricts compositional flexibility.

Conversely, the Sony HX1 delivers comprehensive manual controls including shutter and aperture priority, manual exposure, and exposure compensation - critical tools for enthusiasts and professionals seeking creative control. Its 3" tilting LCD with similar resolution, coupled with a high-resolution electronic viewfinder, provides multiple viewing options in varied shooting scenarios. Although the physical layout is more complex, it is logically arranged to enable quick adjustments.

The HX1 also supports nine autofocus points with center-weighted metering, aiding focused compositions; the FE-5010 provides only center-weightedmetering with no specified AF points. Both models lack touchscreens and do not support face or animal eye detection, reflecting technological limitations of their time.

Sensor and Image Quality: CCD vs CMOS in the Compact Domain

At the sensor level, both cameras utilize small 1/2.3” class sensors of virtually identical physical size - 27.72mm² for the Olympus and 27.94mm² for the Sony - but diverge notably in their design and resolution.

• Olympus FE-5010 employs a 12-megapixel CCD sensor, optimized for higher resolution but traditionally less efficient in low light and dynamic range. The max ISO caps at 1600 native, with base ISO 64.

• Sony HX1 integrates a 9-megapixel CMOS sensor, favored for better low-light capabilities and faster readout essential for burst shooting and video. It supports ISO up to 3200 native with a higher base ISO 125, aligning with its superzoom purpose requiring quick response and noise control.

CCD sensors on the FE-5010 deliver punchy colors and decent detail in good light but struggle with noise and highlight roll-off above ISO 400. The HX1’s CMOS sensor, combined with Sony’s Bionz processor, offers better noise management and dynamic range, particularly noticeable in dim environments - a crucial advantage for wildlife, night, and indoor photography.

Neither camera supports raw capture, a limiting factor for post-processing latitude. The Olympus captures images up to 3968x2976 pixels, higher than the Sony’s 3456x2592, but Sony’s file quality proves more consistent across ISO settings.

User Interface and Display: Visibility and Feedback in the Field

The FE-5010’s fixed 2.7" LCD, with a resolution of 230k dots, provides basic framing aid without tilt capabilities, constraining angled shots - especially problematic in macro or street photography where tricky vantage points are common.

The HX1 improves on this with a larger 3" tilting LCD at similar pixel density, facilitating comfortable low or high-angle compositions such as landscapes or candid street scenes. It also includes an integrated EVF, offering an alternative framing solution in bright daylight or when battery life is a concern during prolonged LCD use.

Neither display system includes advanced features like touch sensitivity or real-time histograms, nor do either cameras have illuminated buttons for low-light operation.

Lens and Zoom Capabilities: Reach and Optical Quality Contrasted

Optical versatility underscores one of the HX1’s core strengths. Its 20x zoom range (28-560mm equivalent) with a bright f/2.8 to 5.2 aperture covers an exceptionally wide field to long telephoto spectrum, enabling diverse shooting from wide landscapes to distant wildlife without lens swaps.

The FE-5010’s 5x zoom (36-180mm equivalent) and aperture range f/3.5 to 5.6 offer a more restrained telephoto reach but maintain reasonable light gathering at the wide end. This narrower zoom is sufficient for casual portraits or street scenes but less flexible for specialized purposes.

Macro capacity also differs: the FE-5010 achieves focus as close as 3cm, while the Sony’s zoom lens allows extremely tight 1cm focusing distance, aiding extreme close-ups critical for macro enthusiasts. Optical image stabilization in the Sony (Optical SteadyShot) arguably outperforms Olympus’s sensor-shift system, delivering steadier images at extended focal lengths and in low light.

Autofocus Systems: Precision and Speed for Diverse Genres

Regarding autofocus, the Sony HX1 offers nine AF points with selectable center, multi-area, and contrast-detection AF via live view, enabling more compositional flexibility and precision focus exclusion zones. Its manual focus option and shutter priority mode further empower professionals to tailor focusing behavior.

The Olympus FE-5010 employs a simpler contrast-detection system with unspecified focus points, no continuous AF, face detection, or tracking features - translating into slower, less reliable performance especially in fast-moving scenes or challenging light.

For genres demanding quick or tracking autofocus - like sports, wildlife, or street photography - the Sony stands clearly ahead.

Olympus FE 5010 front Olympus FE 5010 screen back Sony HX1 front Sony HX1 screen back

Image Quality in Practice: Sample Analysis and Real-World Performance

Reviewing side-by-side images from varied conditions shows the Sony HX1 producing images with richer tonal gradation and better control over shadow noise at higher ISOs. The wider lens aperture on the HX1’s wide end facilitates more background separation for portraits, contributing to more appealing bokeh in well-lit situations.

The FE-5010 renders skin tones with a warmer cast but struggles with noise at ISO levels over 400 and suffers from softer edges in telephoto shots due to the narrower aperture and less advanced stabilization. Both cameras’ smaller sensors impose limits on resolution and dynamic range, but the Sony’s CMOS excels with more consistent clarity in lower light.

Performance Overview: Strengths and Drawbacks Summary

The Sony HX1 ranks superiorly across operational flexibility, lens range, image stabilization, and autofocus, albeit at a notable price and bulk premium. The Olympus FE-5010 remains attractive for entry-level users seeking simplicity at minimal investment and ultimate portability.

Suitability Across Photography Genres: Where Each Camera Excels

Portrait Photography

• Sony HX1: Better suited thanks to brighter aperture (f/2.8), improved manual controls for exposure, and a range that includes moderate telephoto ideal for flattering compression. Moderate bokeh capabilities, though small sensor limits creamy defocus.
• Olympus FE-5010: Limited by smaller zoom and narrower apertures. No face detection or advanced AF reduces speed and accuracy in capturing expressions.

Landscape Photography

• Sony HX1: Superior tilting LCD aids composition; wider focal length covers broad scenes well; manual exposure modes help manage dynamic range. Electronic viewfinder assists framing in bright outdoors.
• Olympus FE-5010: Smaller size benefits portability on excursions, but fixed LCD and less control restrict compositional adjustments.

Wildlife and Sports Photography

• Sony HX1: Distance reach (560mm equivalent) and faster burst capability (up to 10 fps) provide decisive advantages. AF system better suited for moving subjects.
• Olympus FE-5010: Insufficient zoom and no continuous AF hamper effective wildlife/sports shooting.

Street Photography

• Olympus FE-5010: Compactness and light weight make it discreet, easy to carry for spontaneous shooting.
• Sony HX1: Bulk and shutter noise less discreet, though EVF aids in quick focusing.

Macro Photography

• Sony HX1: Superior 1cm minimum focusing distance allows true macro shots; stabilization and manual focus further enhance sharpness.
• Olympus FE-5010: 3cm minimum focus decent but less versatile.

Low Light and Night/Astro Photography

• Sony HX1: Higher ISO ceiling, manual exposure modes, and optical stabilization favor night shooting.
• Olympus FE-5010: ISO capped at 1600 native with poorer noise control limits practical low-light use.

Video Capabilities

• Sony HX1: Records HD-quality video (up to 1440x1080) at 30fps with advanced H.264 compression, delivering higher quality footage, though no mic input limits audio options.
• Olympus FE-5010: Limited to VGA resolution at 30fps using Motion JPEG, considerably lower video quality.

Travel Photography

• Olympus FE-5010: Compact and lightweight, excels in pocketability and minimal carry burden; ideal for casual snaps with straightforward operation.
• Sony HX1: Bulkier but versatile - a better all-in-one for travelers wanting comprehensive focal length coverage and greater creative control.

Professional Workflows

Neither camera supports raw files - an important limitation for professionals requiring full post-processing flexibility. Files are JPEG-only with limited dynamic range.

The Sony’s manual controls and exposure compensation partially mitigate this by enabling more precise capture. Neither model offers wireless connectivity or tethering support, constraining modern professional workflow integration.

Build Quality and Environmental Robustness

The Olympus FE-5010 notes environmental sealing, enhancing durability against moisture and dust - a notable advantage in rugged conditions. There is no waterproof, shockproof, or freeze-proof rating for either camera, but the FE-5010 displays a more robust physical design for uncertain outdoor ambient.

The Sony HX1 lacks such sealing features, emphasizing optical performance and controls over environmental ruggedness.

Battery Life and Storage

Both cameras rely on proprietary rechargeable batteries - Olympus uses LI-42B, Sony NP-FH50. Battery life data is sparse, but in practice, the Sony’s larger body and EVF tend toward higher power consumption; the Olympus offers longer use per charge on simpler electronics.

The Olympus supports xD-Picture Cards and microSD (with adapter); the Sony uses Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo and internal memory. Availability of storage media today is a critical consideration given the obsolescence of xD and Memory Stick formats.

Connectivity and Data Transfer

Neither camera includes Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or NFC - expected for their release era.

Sony includes HDMI output, beneficial for direct playback on HDTVs; Olympus does not. Both have USB 2.0 interfaces for data transfer at similar speeds but lack tethered shooting or remote control capabilities.

Final Recommendations: Optimal User Profiles for Each Camera

For the Candid Traveler or Everyday User:

• The Olympus FE-5010 wins on sheer portability, simplicity, and affordable pricing. It is a solid secondary or backup camera for snapshots in good light when minimal fuss and instant sharing are prioritized.

For Enthusiasts Needing Versatility and Creative Control:

• The Sony Cyber-shot HX1 presents a significantly more flexible package with manual exposure modes, a pro-grade zoom range, improved stabilization, and enhanced image quality at the expense of bulk and cost. Its strengths notably benefit wildlife, sports, macro, landscape, and video photographers.

For Professionals:

• Neither camera fully meets professional demands due to lack of raw support, connectivity, and advanced autofocus features. The Sony HX1 could nonetheless serve as a lightweight companion or documentation tool, where high image fidelity and manual control in a single unit outweigh limitations.

Concluding Insights

Our comparative assessment situates these cameras firmly in their historical and technical context. The Olympus FE-5010 offers a compact and straightforward user experience designed for casual shooters prioritizing convenience and ease of use. The Sony HX1, while heavier and costlier, delivers a broader feature set, superior optics, and more extensive manual control that appeals to dedicated enthusiasts and semi-professionals engaging with a wider array of photographic challenges.

Your decision should weigh the trade-offs between size, control, image quality, and budget against your intended photographic subjects and shooting environments. This understanding, grounded in extensive hands-on testing, ensures a choice aligned with real-world outcomes rather than marketing promises.

Images integrated to enhance comprehension at relevant sections:

• 
• 
• 
• 
• Olympus FE 5010 front Olympus FE 5010 screen back Sony HX1 front Sony HX1 screen back