Olympus FE-5010 vs Sony TX55
96 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
97 Imaging
39 Features
46 Overall
41
Olympus FE-5010 vs Sony TX55 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-180mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 130g - 96 x 57 x 21mm
- Launched January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 109g - 93 x 54 x 13mm
- Released July 2011
Photography Glossary Olympus FE-5010 vs Sony TX55 Overview
Its time to look more in depth at the Olympus FE-5010 versus Sony TX55, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Ultracompact by rivals Olympus and Sony. There is a considerable difference among the sensor resolutions of the FE-5010 (12MP) and TX55 (16MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe FE-5010 was manufactured 3 years before the TX55 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus FE-5010 being a Compact camera and the Sony TX55 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting right into a detailed comparison, here is a brief view of how the FE-5010 matches up vs the TX55 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus FE-5010 vs Sony TX55 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus FE-5010 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX55. The entire galleries are available at Olympus FE-5010 Gallery & Sony TX55 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5010 over the Sony TX55
| FE-5010 | TX55 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony TX55 over the Olympus FE-5010
| TX55 | FE-5010 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | July 2011 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 30 months |
| Manual focus |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Screen size | 3.3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.6") |
| Screen resolution | 1230k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+1000k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus FE-5010 and Sony TX55
| FE-5010 | TX55 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus FE-5010 vs Sony TX55 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry around your camera frequently, you're going to have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus FE-5010 provides exterior measurements of 96mm x 57mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.8") along with a weight of 130 grams (0.29 lbs) whilst the Sony TX55 has measurements of 93mm x 54mm x 13mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.5") accompanied by a weight of 109 grams (0.24 lbs).
Check out the Olympus FE-5010 versus Sony TX55 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are employing at that time. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the FE-5010 and the TX55.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the FE-5010 and TX55 is 96 and 97 respectively.
Olympus FE-5010 vs Sony TX55 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very tough to picture the contrast in sensor sizes only by looking through specifications. The pic below will help provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the FE-5010 and TX55.
To sum up, the two cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different megapixels. You can expect the Sony TX55 to result in extra detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more aged FE-5010 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus FE-5010 vs Sony TX55 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus FE-5010 vs Sony TX55 Specifications
| Olympus FE-5010 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX55 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus FE-5010 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX55 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2009-01-07 | 2011-07-24 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | BIONZ |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 36-180mm (5.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | f/3.5-4.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7" | 3.3" |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 1,230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | - | XtraFine OLED display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | 3.70 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720 (30fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 130 gr (0.29 lb) | 109 gr (0.24 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 57 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 93 x 54 x 13mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 250 pictures |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-42B | NP-BN |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | xD-Picture Card (1GB, 2GB), microSD (MASD-1 is required) | microSD/SDHC, Memory Stick Micro |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $130 | $350 |