Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus E-M1 II
95 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus E-M1 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-120mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 137g - 93 x 56 x 25mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Additionally Known as X-935
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Introduced September 2016
- Old Model is Olympus E-M1
- New Model is Olympus E-M1 III
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus E-M1 II Overview
Lets look much closer at the Olympus FE-5020 and Olympus E-M1 II, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Pro Mirrorless and both are manufactured by Olympus. There is a crucial difference among the sensor resolutions of the FE-5020 (12MP) and E-M1 II (20MP) and the FE-5020 (1/2.3") and E-M1 II (Four Thirds) come with totally different sensor size.
Photography GlossaryThe FE-5020 was brought out 8 years prior to the E-M1 II which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus FE-5020 being a Compact camera and the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before going in to a more detailed comparison, below is a simple summation of how the FE-5020 grades versus the E-M1 II in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus E-M1 II Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus FE-5020 and Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II. The entire galleries are available at Olympus FE-5020 Gallery and Olympus E-M1 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5020 over the Olympus E-M1 II
FE-5020 | E-M1 II |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Olympus FE-5020
E-M1 II | FE-5020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2016 | July 2009 | More modern by 87 months | |
Manual focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 1037k | 230k | Sharper screen (+807k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus FE-5020 and Olympus E-M1 II
FE-5020 | E-M1 II |
---|
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus E-M1 II Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry around your camera, you are going to need to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus FE-5020 features outside measurements of 93mm x 56mm x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") having a weight of 137 grams (0.30 lbs) while the Olympus E-M1 II has sizing of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") having a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus FE-5020 and Olympus E-M1 II in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. Underneath is the front view physical size comparison of the FE-5020 against the E-M1 II.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the FE-5020 and E-M1 II is 95 and 68 respectively.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus E-M1 II Sensor Comparison
Often, its hard to see the contrast in sensor sizes purely by viewing specifications. The image here will help provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the FE-5020 and E-M1 II.
To sum up, each of the cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The FE-5020 featuring a smaller sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field tougher and the Olympus E-M1 II will result in greater detail having its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The more aged FE-5020 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus E-M1 II Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus E-M1 II Specifications
Olympus FE-5020 | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus FE-5020 | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II |
Also referred to as | X-935 | - |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Pro Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2009-07-22 | 2016-09-19 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | TruePic VIII |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 17.4 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 226.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 20MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5184 x 3888 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 200 |
RAW support | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | - | 64 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 121 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens zoom range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/3.3-5.8 | - |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Display size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 1,037 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/500 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
Highest quiet shutter speed | - | 1/32000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 60.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.10 m | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/250 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 4096x2160 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MOV, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 137g (0.30 lb) | 574g (1.27 lb) |
Dimensions | 93 x 56 x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 80 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.8 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1312 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 350 photos |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-42B | BLH-1 |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | xD-Picture Card, microSD | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots |
Card slots | 1 | Two |
Retail cost | $160 | $1,700 |