Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus E-M10 III
95 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
80 Imaging
55 Features
75 Overall
63
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus E-M10 III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-120mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 137g - 93 x 56 x 25mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Also referred to as X-935
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
- Announced August 2017
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M10 II
- New Model is Olympus E-M10 IV
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus E-M10 III Overview
Below, we are comparing the Olympus FE-5020 versus Olympus E-M10 III, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and they are both offered by Olympus. There is a sizable difference between the sensor resolutions of the FE-5020 (12MP) and E-M10 III (16MP) and the FE-5020 (1/2.3") and E-M10 III (Four Thirds) feature totally different sensor measurements.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe FE-5020 was released 9 years prior to the E-M10 III and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus FE-5020 being a Compact camera and the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving through a full comparison, below is a short introduction of how the FE-5020 matches up vs the E-M10 III in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus E-M10 III Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus FE-5020 & Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus FE-5020 Gallery & Olympus E-M10 III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5020 over the Olympus E-M10 III
FE-5020 | E-M10 III |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Olympus FE-5020
E-M10 III | FE-5020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | August 2017 | July 2009 | Fresher by 98 months | |
Manually focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 230k | Crisper display (+810k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus FE-5020 and Olympus E-M10 III
FE-5020 | E-M10 III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | No selfie screen |
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus E-M10 III Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus FE-5020 offers external measurements of 93mm x 56mm x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") and a weight of 137 grams (0.30 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-M10 III has measurements of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") having a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus FE-5020 versus Olympus E-M10 III in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have chosen during that time. Below is the front view over all size comparison of the FE-5020 vs the E-M10 III.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the FE-5020 and E-M10 III is 95 and 80 respectively.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus E-M10 III Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be hard to see the contrast between sensor sizing simply by checking specs. The photograph underneath might give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the FE-5020 and E-M10 III.
All in all, both of these cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The FE-5020 because of its tinier sensor will make shooting bokeh harder and the Olympus E-M10 III will resolve extra detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos much more aggressively. The older FE-5020 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus E-M10 III Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus E-M10 III Specifications
Olympus FE-5020 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus FE-5020 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III |
Also called as | X-935 | - |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2009-07-22 | 2017-08-31 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | TruePic VIII |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 17.4 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 226.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 200 |
RAW photos | ||
Min boosted ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 121 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens focal range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/3.3-5.8 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 107 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 1,040 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.62x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/500 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Maximum silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 8.6fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.10 m | 5.80 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | - | 1/250 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 137g (0.30 lbs) | 410g (0.90 lbs) |
Dimensions | 93 x 56 x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") | 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 330 images |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-42B | BLS-50 |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | xD-Picture Card, microSD | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $160 | $650 |