Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus E-M5 II
95 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
80 Imaging
53 Features
84 Overall
65
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus E-M5 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-120mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 137g - 93 x 56 x 25mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Alternate Name is X-935
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 469g - 124 x 85 x 45mm
- Announced February 2015
- Replaced the Olympus E-M5
- Replacement is Olympus E-M5 III
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus E-M5 II Overview
On this page, we will be matching up the Olympus FE-5020 and Olympus E-M5 II, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless and both are built by Olympus. There exists a substantial gap between the image resolutions of the FE-5020 (12MP) and E-M5 II (16MP) and the FE-5020 (1/2.3") and E-M5 II (Four Thirds) have totally different sensor size.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe FE-5020 was released 6 years prior to the E-M5 II which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus FE-5020 being a Compact camera and the Olympus E-M5 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving into a complete comparison, here is a simple view of how the FE-5020 grades vs the E-M5 II with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus E-M5 II Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus FE-5020 & Olympus OM-D E-M5 II. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus FE-5020 Gallery & Olympus E-M5 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5020 over the Olympus E-M5 II
| FE-5020 | E-M5 II |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 II over the Olympus FE-5020
| E-M5 II | FE-5020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2015 |  | July 2009 | More modern by 67 months |
| Manual focus |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 1037k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+807k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies | ||
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus FE-5020 and Olympus E-M5 II
| FE-5020 | E-M5 II |
|---|
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus E-M5 II Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry around your camera frequently, you need to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus FE-5020 has outer measurements of 93mm x 56mm x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") and a weight of 137 grams (0.30 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-M5 II has proportions of 124mm x 85mm x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") with a weight of 469 grams (1.03 lbs).
Examine the Olympus FE-5020 and Olympus E-M5 II in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have attached at that time. The following is a front view over all size comparison of the FE-5020 versus the E-M5 II.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the FE-5020 and E-M5 II is 95 and 80 respectively.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus E-M5 II Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is tough to envision the difference between sensor sizes just by looking at specifications. The picture underneath will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the FE-5020 and E-M5 II.
To sum up, each of these cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The FE-5020 because of its tinier sensor will make shooting shallow DOF more difficult and the Olympus E-M5 II will resolve more detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The more aged FE-5020 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus E-M5 II Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus E-M5 II Specifications
| Olympus FE-5020 | Olympus OM-D E-M5 II | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus FE-5020 | Olympus OM-D E-M5 II |
| Otherwise known as | X-935 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Introduced | 2009-07-22 | 2015-02-06 |
| Body design | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CCD | MOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 224.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 200 |
| RAW format | ||
| Min boosted ISO | - | 100 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 81 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
| Lens zoom range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | - |
| Max aperture | f/3.3-5.8 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Available lenses | - | 107 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Display size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 1,037k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/500 secs | 1/8000 secs |
| Highest quiet shutter speed | - | 1/16000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.10 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | - | 1/250 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 137 gr (0.30 lb) | 469 gr (1.03 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 93 x 56 x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") | 124 x 85 x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 73 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.0 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.4 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 896 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 310 photographs |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-42B | BLN-1 |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | xD-Picture Card, microSD | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $160 | $699 |