Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus E-PL1s
95 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/99d7a/99d7a0804ed60f6f44afcaa95ce459edbbe50dd6" alt="Olympus FE-5020 front Olympus FE-5020 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/10c2f/10c2fc55195237e69fad4f95871fa6ff43ec81c2" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL1s front Olympus PEN E-PL1s front"
86 Imaging
47 Features
43 Overall
45
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus E-PL1s Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-120mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 137g - 93 x 56 x 25mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Additionally Known as X-935
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 334g - 115 x 72 x 42mm
- Released November 2010
- Older Model is Olympus E-PL1
- Updated by Olympus E-PL2
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus E-PL1s Overview
Here, we will be contrasting the Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus E-PL1s, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and both of them are created by Olympus. The image resolution of the FE-5020 (12MP) and the E-PL1s (12MP) is relatively well matched but the FE-5020 (1/2.3") and E-PL1s (Four Thirds) have totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The FE-5020 was released 16 months prior to the E-PL1s which makes them a generation apart from each other. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus FE-5020 being a Compact camera and the Olympus E-PL1s being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise summary of how the FE-5020 scores vs the E-PL1s with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus E-PL1s Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus FE-5020 and Olympus PEN E-PL1s. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus FE-5020 Gallery and Olympus E-PL1s Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5020 over the Olympus E-PL1s
FE-5020 | E-PL1s |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL1s over the Olympus FE-5020
E-PL1s | FE-5020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | November 2010 | ![]() | July 2009 | Fresher by 16 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | More precise focusing |
Common features in the Olympus FE-5020 and Olympus E-PL1s
FE-5020 | E-PL1s | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen size | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Same screen measurement |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | The same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither has Touch screen |
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus E-PL1s Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry your camera, you need to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus FE-5020 has external dimensions of 93mm x 56mm x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") having a weight of 137 grams (0.30 lbs) and the Olympus E-PL1s has proportions of 115mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") and a weight of 334 grams (0.74 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus E-PL1s in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you select at the time. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the FE-5020 and the E-PL1s.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a3de9/a3de93440a799272dc73a5ae449c2741d7e3a290" alt="Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus E-PL1s size comparison Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus E-PL1s size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the FE-5020 and E-PL1s is 95 and 86 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eed14/eed14847eeb07e49692bb2a5acb8f39c9b9cd3c1" alt="Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus E-PL1s top view buttons comparison Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus E-PL1s top view buttons comparison"
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus E-PL1s Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very difficult to see the contrast between sensor sizing merely by looking at technical specs. The photograph below will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the FE-5020 and E-PL1s.
As you have seen, the two cameras come with the identical MP albeit not the same sensor sizing. The FE-5020 features the tinier sensor which should make getting bokeh tougher. The older FE-5020 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/828fa/828fa67b9510d476aca4a651fe1b02e49be59ae3" alt="Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus E-PL1s sensor size comparison Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus E-PL1s sensor size comparison"
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus E-PL1s Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ceb1b/ceb1b5f6e3e99aea8b7d854c210ad5b5736d09ea" alt="Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus E-PL1s Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus E-PL1s Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus E-PL1s Specifications
Olympus FE-5020 | Olympus PEN E-PL1s | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus FE-5020 | Olympus PEN E-PL1s |
Also Known as | X-935 | - |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2009-07-22 | 2010-11-16 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | Truepic V |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4032 x 3024 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens zoom range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/3.3-5.8 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 107 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | - | HyperCrystal LCD AR (Anti-Reflective) coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/500 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.10 m | 10.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 137g (0.30 lb) | 334g (0.74 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 93 x 56 x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") | 115 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 290 images |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-42B | BLS-1 |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | xD-Picture Card, microSD | SD/SDHC |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $160 | $599 |