Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus E-PM1
95 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
89 Imaging
48 Features
52 Overall
49
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus E-PM1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-120mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 137g - 93 x 56 x 25mm
- Released July 2009
- Other Name is X-935
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 265g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Announced November 2011
- Replacement is Olympus E-PM2
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus E-PM1 Overview
Its time to look much closer at the Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus E-PM1, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and both are produced by Olympus. The image resolution of the FE-5020 (12MP) and the E-PM1 (12MP) is relatively similar but the FE-5020 (1/2.3") and E-PM1 (Four Thirds) boast totally different sensor dimensions.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe FE-5020 was released 3 years prior to the E-PM1 which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus FE-5020 being a Compact camera and the Olympus E-PM1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving into a more detailed comparison, here is a quick summation of how the FE-5020 matches up vs the E-PM1 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus E-PM1 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus FE-5020 & Olympus PEN E-PM1. The complete galleries are available at Olympus FE-5020 Gallery & Olympus E-PM1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5020 over the Olympus E-PM1
FE-5020 | E-PM1 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM1 over the Olympus FE-5020
E-PM1 | FE-5020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | November 2011 | July 2009 | Newer by 28 months | |
Manual focus | More exact focusing | |||
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus FE-5020 and Olympus E-PM1
FE-5020 | E-PM1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither features Touch screen |
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus E-PM1 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to travel with your camera often, you have to consider its weight and size. The Olympus FE-5020 enjoys external dimensions of 93mm x 56mm x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") with a weight of 137 grams (0.30 lbs) while the Olympus E-PM1 has specifications of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 265 grams (0.58 lbs).
Check the Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus E-PM1 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the FE-5020 compared to the E-PM1.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the FE-5020 and E-PM1 is 95 and 89 respectively.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus E-PM1 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is hard to envision the gap between sensor dimensions only by reading specifications. The pic here will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the FE-5020 and E-PM1.
To sum up, both the cameras feature the identical megapixel count albeit not the same sensor dimensions. The FE-5020 offers the tinier sensor which will make getting shallower depth of field trickier. The more aged FE-5020 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus E-PM1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus E-PM1 Specifications
Olympus FE-5020 | Olympus PEN E-PM1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus FE-5020 | Olympus PEN E-PM1 |
Other name | X-935 | - |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2009-07-22 | 2011-11-23 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | TruePic VI |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4032 x 3024 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens zoom range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/3.3-5.8 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 107 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display tech | - | HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/500 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 6.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.10 m | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | - | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | AVCHD, Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 137g (0.30 pounds) | 265g (0.58 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 93 x 56 x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 52 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 21.0 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.3 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 499 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 330 photos |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-42B | BLS-5 |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | xD-Picture Card, microSD | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $160 | $499 |