Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus 9000
Portability
95 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
95 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
Portability
92 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
92 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus 9000 Key Specs
Olympus FE-5020
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-120mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 137g - 93 x 56 x 25mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Alternate Name is X-935
Olympus 9000
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Launched May 2009
- Also referred to as mju 9000
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus 9000 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Olympus FE-5020 and Olympus 9000, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras and they are both offered by Olympus. The image resolution of the FE-5020 (12MP) and the 9000 (12MP) is fairly similar and both cameras offer the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe FE-5020 was released 3 months after the 9000 and they are of a similar age. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a detailed comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the FE-5020 scores vs the 9000 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus 9000 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus FE-5020 & Olympus Stylus 9000. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus FE-5020 Gallery & Olympus 9000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5020 over the Olympus 9000
| FE-5020 | 9000 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Olympus FE-5020
| 9000 | FE-5020 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus FE-5020 and Olympus 9000
| FE-5020 | 9000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | July 2009 |  | May 2009 | Similar age |
| Manual focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Equal display measurement |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | The same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus 9000 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry around your camera, you should take into account its weight and size. The Olympus FE-5020 offers external measurements of 93mm x 56mm x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") along with a weight of 137 grams (0.30 lbs) and the Olympus 9000 has specifications of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs).
Compare the Olympus FE-5020 and Olympus 9000 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are using at that time. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the FE-5020 versus the 9000.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the FE-5020 and 9000 is 95 and 92 respectively.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus 9000 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is difficult to visualize the gap between sensor sizes simply by reading a spec sheet. The picture underneath will help provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the FE-5020 and 9000.
As you can see, both of those cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the same resolution and you can expect similar quality of images though you should factor the age of the products into consideration.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus 9000 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus FE-5020 Portrait photography details
Olympus 9000 Portrait photography details
focusing manually not possible
manual exposure not available
external flash not possible
MP count low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
no manual focus
manual mode not possible
no external flash support
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Olympus FE-5020 Street photography details
Olympus 9000 Street photography details
environment proof
lighter than others (137 grams)
fixed screen
no image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen is fixed
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
more heavy than competitors (225 grams)
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Olympus FE-5020 as a Sports photography camera
Olympus 9000 as a Sports photography camera
environment proof
max shutter speed is low (1/500 seconds)
no shutter priority
no image stabilization
MP count low (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no shutter priority
low megapixels (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Travel photography with Olympus FE-5020
Travel photography with Olympus 9000
lighter than others (137 grams)
environment proof
flash built-in
quite wide (24mm)
lack of Timelapse mode
MP count low (12 megapixels)
does not feature selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
has built in flash
rather wide (28mm)
long reach (280mm)
no Timelapse mode
more heavy than competitors (225 grams)
low megapixels (12MP)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.2)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Olympus FE-5020 Landscape photography details
Olympus 9000 Landscape photography details
quite wide (24mm)
environment proof
focusing manually not possible
can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
tiny screen (2.7 inch)
manual exposure not available
no image stabilization
MP count low (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
lack of Timelapse mode
rather wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.2)
small screen (2.7")
manual mode not possible
low megapixels (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
no Timelapse mode
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Olympus FE-5020 Vlogging information
Olympus 9000 Vlogging information
quite wide (24mm)
lighter than others (137g)
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
does not feature selfie friendly display
no image stabilization
video res low (640 x 480 pixels)
lack of microphone port
rather wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.2)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
low res video (640 x 480 pixels)
no external microphone support
more heavy than competitors (225g)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus 9000 Specifications
| Olympus FE-5020 | Olympus Stylus 9000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus FE-5020 | Olympus Stylus 9000 |
| Otherwise known as | X-935 | mju 9000 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2009-07-22 | 2009-05-14 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 50 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 28-280mm (10.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.3-5.8 | f/3.2-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/500 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.10 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 137 grams (0.30 pounds) | 225 grams (0.50 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 93 x 56 x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | LI-42B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (12 seconds) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | xD-Picture Card, microSD | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $160 | $300 |