Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus SH-2
95 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
88 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus SH-2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-120mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 137g - 93 x 56 x 25mm
- Released July 2009
- Also Known as X-935
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Announced March 2015
- Earlier Model is Olympus SH-1
- Refreshed by Olympus SH-3
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus SH-2 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Olympus FE-5020 versus Olympus SH-2, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are offered by Olympus. There is a noticeable difference between the resolutions of the FE-5020 (12MP) and SH-2 (16MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe FE-5020 was launched 6 years earlier than the SH-2 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a detailed comparison, here is a short summation of how the FE-5020 matches up vs the SH-2 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus SH-2 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus FE-5020 & Olympus Stylus SH-2. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus FE-5020 Gallery & Olympus SH-2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5020 over the Olympus SH-2
| FE-5020 | SH-2 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-2 over the Olympus FE-5020
| SH-2 | FE-5020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | March 2015 |  | July 2009 | More recent by 68 months |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus FE-5020 and Olympus SH-2
| FE-5020 | SH-2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen |
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus SH-2 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you will want to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus FE-5020 offers physical measurements of 93mm x 56mm x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 137 grams (0.30 lbs) and the Olympus SH-2 has measurements of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus FE-5020 versus Olympus SH-2 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the FE-5020 against the SH-2.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the FE-5020 and SH-2 is 95 and 88 respectively.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus SH-2 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's tough to picture the gap between sensor measurements just by looking at specifications. The graphic underneath will give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the FE-5020 and SH-2.
To sum up, both of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different resolution. You can count on the Olympus SH-2 to give you extra detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The older FE-5020 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus SH-2 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus SH-2 Specifications
| Olympus FE-5020 | Olympus Stylus SH-2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus FE-5020 | Olympus Stylus SH-2 |
| Other name | X-935 | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2009-07-22 | 2015-03-11 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.3-5.8 | f/3.0-6.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/500 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 11.5 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.10 m | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 137 gr (0.30 pounds) | 271 gr (0.60 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 93 x 56 x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 380 photos |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-42B | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | xD-Picture Card, microSD | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail pricing | $160 | $399 |