Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus SH-2
95 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
88 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus SH-2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-120mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 137g - 93 x 56 x 25mm
- Released July 2009
- Also Known as X-935
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Announced March 2015
- Earlier Model is Olympus SH-1
- Refreshed by Olympus SH-3
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus SH-2 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Olympus FE-5020 versus Olympus SH-2, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are offered by Olympus. There is a noticeable difference between the resolutions of the FE-5020 (12MP) and SH-2 (16MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe FE-5020 was launched 6 years earlier than the SH-2 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a detailed comparison, here is a short summation of how the FE-5020 matches up vs the SH-2 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus SH-2 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus FE-5020 & Olympus Stylus SH-2. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus FE-5020 Gallery & Olympus SH-2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5020 over the Olympus SH-2
| FE-5020 | SH-2 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-2 over the Olympus FE-5020
| SH-2 | FE-5020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | March 2015 |  | July 2009 | More recent by 68 months |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus FE-5020 and Olympus SH-2
| FE-5020 | SH-2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen |
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus SH-2 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you will want to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus FE-5020 offers physical measurements of 93mm x 56mm x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 137 grams (0.30 lbs) and the Olympus SH-2 has measurements of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus FE-5020 versus Olympus SH-2 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the FE-5020 against the SH-2.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the FE-5020 and SH-2 is 95 and 88 respectively.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus SH-2 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's tough to picture the gap between sensor measurements just by looking at specifications. The graphic underneath will give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the FE-5020 and SH-2.
To sum up, both of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different resolution. You can count on the Olympus SH-2 to give you extra detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The older FE-5020 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus SH-2 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus SH-2 Specifications
| Olympus FE-5020 | Olympus Stylus SH-2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus FE-5020 | Olympus Stylus SH-2 |
| Other name | X-935 | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2009-07-22 | 2015-03-11 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.3-5.8 | f/3.0-6.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/500 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 11.5 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.10 m | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 137 gr (0.30 pounds) | 271 gr (0.60 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 93 x 56 x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 380 photos |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-42B | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | xD-Picture Card, microSD | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail pricing | $160 | $399 |