Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus SH-3
95 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
88 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus SH-3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-120mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 137g - 93 x 56 x 25mm
- Announced July 2009
- Alternate Name is X-935
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Released February 2016
- Replaced the Olympus SH-2
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus SH-3 Overview
The following is a detailed overview of the Olympus FE-5020 versus Olympus SH-3, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are created by Olympus. There exists a significant gap between the resolutions of the FE-5020 (12MP) and SH-3 (16MP) but they use the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe FE-5020 was revealed 7 years prior to the SH-3 which is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a concise summation of how the FE-5020 grades against the SH-3 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus SH-3 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus FE-5020 and Olympus Stylus SH-3. The full galleries are available at Olympus FE-5020 Gallery and Olympus SH-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5020 over the Olympus SH-3
| FE-5020 | SH-3 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-3 over the Olympus FE-5020
| SH-3 | FE-5020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2016 |  | July 2009 | Newer by 79 months |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus FE-5020 and Olympus SH-3
| FE-5020 | SH-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus SH-3 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you will have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus FE-5020 provides outer measurements of 93mm x 56mm x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") with a weight of 137 grams (0.30 lbs) and the Olympus SH-3 has dimensions of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus FE-5020 versus Olympus SH-3 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have attached at the time. Below is the front view size comparison of the FE-5020 vs the SH-3.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the FE-5020 and SH-3 is 95 and 88 respectively.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus SH-3 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be tough to visualize the contrast between sensor dimensions simply by checking a spec sheet. The image underneath will give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the FE-5020 and SH-3.
Clearly, both of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different megapixels. You should count on the Olympus SH-3 to give you more detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The more aged FE-5020 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus SH-3 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus SH-3 Specifications
| Olympus FE-5020 | Olympus Stylus SH-3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus FE-5020 | Olympus Stylus SH-3 |
| Otherwise known as | X-935 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2009-07-22 | 2016-02-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.3-5.8 | f/3.0-6.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/500 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 11.5 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.10 m | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (15 fps), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 137 gr (0.30 lb) | 271 gr (0.60 lb) |
| Dimensions | 93 x 56 x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 380 photographs |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-42B | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | xD-Picture Card, microSD | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail price | $160 | $579 |