Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus TG-870
95 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/99d7a/99d7a0804ed60f6f44afcaa95ce459edbbe50dd6" alt="Olympus FE-5020 front Olympus FE-5020 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/98cb4/98cb42e909dff8452621d79a82a9f24270e5e01f" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 front Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 front"
91 Imaging
41 Features
46 Overall
43
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus TG-870 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-120mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 137g - 93 x 56 x 25mm
- Announced July 2009
- Additionally Known as X-935
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Raise to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 221g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2016
- Replaced the Olympus TG-860
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus TG-870 Overview
Its time to look more in depth at the Olympus FE-5020 and Olympus TG-870, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Ultracompact and both of them are manufactured by Olympus. There exists a sizeable gap among the sensor resolutions of the FE-5020 (12MP) and TG-870 (16MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The FE-5020 was introduced 7 years before the TG-870 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus FE-5020 being a Compact camera and the Olympus TG-870 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going into a in depth comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the FE-5020 scores against the TG-870 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus TG-870 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus FE-5020 and Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870. The whole galleries are available at Olympus FE-5020 Gallery and Olympus TG-870 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5020 over the Olympus TG-870
FE-5020 | TG-870 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-870 over the Olympus FE-5020
TG-870 | FE-5020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2016 | ![]() | July 2009 | Newer by 78 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 921k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+691k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus FE-5020 and Olympus TG-870
FE-5020 | TG-870 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | No manual focus | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus TG-870 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to travel with your camera, you'll need to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus FE-5020 has got exterior measurements of 93mm x 56mm x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 137 grams (0.30 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-870 has proportions of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") and a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs).
Examine the Olympus FE-5020 and Olympus TG-870 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you choose during that time. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the FE-5020 vs the TG-870.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/83b47/83b47e296676a09791f51da7f33f687109441fb4" alt="Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus TG-870 size comparison Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus TG-870 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the FE-5020 and TG-870 is 95 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c77f1/c77f138903ca1e8a94b5ce393729fa02c4b6691b" alt="Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus TG-870 top view buttons comparison Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus TG-870 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus TG-870 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very hard to envision the difference in sensor dimensions merely by viewing a spec sheet. The image below will give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the FE-5020 and TG-870.
As you can see, each of these cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same MP. You should expect the Olympus TG-870 to render greater detail using its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs way more aggressively. The more aged FE-5020 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/30bf2/30bf26750a55daa4b36d298f58f95e6f6c2dcd2d" alt="Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus TG-870 sensor size comparison Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus TG-870 sensor size comparison"
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus TG-870 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0284c/0284cf80f5c68f920175d02aa2ef72698749fdfc" alt="Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus TG-870 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus TG-870 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus TG-870 Specifications
Olympus FE-5020 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus FE-5020 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 |
Also referred to as | X-935 | - |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2009-07-22 | 2016-01-06 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 125 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.3-5.8 | f/3.5-5.7 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
Display resolution | 230k dots | 921k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/500 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 7.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.10 m | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 137 grams (0.30 lbs) | 221 grams (0.49 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 93 x 56 x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") | 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 photos |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-42B | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | xD-Picture Card, microSD | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $160 | $280 |