Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus VG-110
95 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
97 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus VG-110 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-120mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 137g - 93 x 56 x 25mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Additionally referred to as X-935
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 105g - 92 x 54 x 20mm
- Released February 2011
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus VG-110 Overview
The following is a extensive analysis of the Olympus FE-5020 versus Olympus VG-110, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Ultracompact and they are both offered by Olympus. The image resolution of the FE-5020 (12MP) and the VG-110 (12MP) is relatively well matched and both cameras have the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe FE-5020 was introduced 18 months prior to the VG-110 which makes them a generation away from each other. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus FE-5020 being a Compact camera and the Olympus VG-110 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple overview of how the FE-5020 grades against the VG-110 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus VG-110 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus FE-5020 & Olympus VG-110. The whole galleries are available at Olympus FE-5020 Gallery & Olympus VG-110 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5020 over the Olympus VG-110
FE-5020 | VG-110 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-110 over the Olympus FE-5020
VG-110 | FE-5020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2011 | July 2009 | Newer by 18 months |
Common features in the Olympus FE-5020 and Olympus VG-110
FE-5020 | VG-110 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | No manual focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimensions | 2.7" | 2.7" | Equal screen sizing | |
Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Exact same screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus VG-110 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to travel with your camera frequently, you're going to have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus FE-5020 offers external measurements of 93mm x 56mm x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") along with a weight of 137 grams (0.30 lbs) whilst the Olympus VG-110 has dimensions of 92mm x 54mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") along with a weight of 105 grams (0.23 lbs).
Compare the Olympus FE-5020 versus Olympus VG-110 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have attached at that time. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the FE-5020 against the VG-110.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the FE-5020 and VG-110 is 95 and 97 respectively.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus VG-110 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by looking at specs. The image below might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the FE-5020 and VG-110.
All in all, the two cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the same exact MP therefore you can expect similar quality of pictures but you may want to factor the age of the products into consideration. The more aged FE-5020 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus VG-110 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus VG-110 Specifications
Olympus FE-5020 | Olympus VG-110 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus FE-5020 | Olympus VG-110 |
Also called as | X-935 | - |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2009-07-22 | 2011-02-08 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 27-108mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.3-5.8 | f/2.9-6.5 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/500 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.10 m | 4.70 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 137 gr (0.30 pounds) | 105 gr (0.23 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 93 x 56 x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") | 92 x 54 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 170 photos |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-42B | LI-70B |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | xD-Picture Card, microSD | SD/SDHC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $160 | $150 |