Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus VH-410
95 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
95 Imaging
39 Features
34 Overall
37
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus VH-410 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-120mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 137g - 93 x 56 x 25mm
- Released July 2009
- Also referred to as X-935
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 102 x 60 x 21mm
- Released August 2012
Photography Glossary Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus VH-410 Overview
Let's look a little more in depth at the Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus VH-410, both Small Sensor Compact cameras and they are both produced by Olympus. There exists a large gap among the resolutions of the FE-5020 (12MP) and VH-410 (16MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe FE-5020 was brought out 4 years prior to the VH-410 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a in depth comparison, here is a quick summary of how the FE-5020 grades against the VH-410 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus VH-410 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus FE-5020 & Olympus VH-410. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus FE-5020 Gallery & Olympus VH-410 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5020 over the Olympus VH-410
| FE-5020 | VH-410 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus VH-410 over the Olympus FE-5020
| VH-410 | FE-5020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | August 2012 |  | July 2009 | More recent by 37 months |
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus FE-5020 and Olympus VH-410
| FE-5020 | VH-410 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen |
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus VH-410 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to lug around your camera, you'll need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus FE-5020 provides exterior dimensions of 93mm x 56mm x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") having a weight of 137 grams (0.30 lbs) whilst the Olympus VH-410 has dimensions of 102mm x 60mm x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus VH-410 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you use at that time. Following is a front view measurements comparison of the FE-5020 vs the VH-410.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the FE-5020 and VH-410 is 95 and 95 respectively.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus VH-410 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its difficult to visualise the gap in sensor measurements merely by going through specs. The photograph underneath should provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the FE-5020 and VH-410.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same megapixels. You can expect to see the Olympus VH-410 to produce more detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The older FE-5020 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus VH-410 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus VH-410 Specifications
| Olympus FE-5020 | Olympus VH-410 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus FE-5020 | Olympus VH-410 |
| Also Known as | X-935 | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2009-07-22 | 2012-08-21 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.3-5.8 | f/2.8-6.5 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/500 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.10 m | 4.70 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 137 gr (0.30 pounds) | 152 gr (0.34 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 93 x 56 x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") | 102 x 60 x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | LI-42B | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | xD-Picture Card, microSD | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $160 | $186 |