Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus XZ-1
95 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
88 Imaging
35 Features
51 Overall
41
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus XZ-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-120mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 137g - 93 x 56 x 25mm
- Launched July 2009
- Additionally referred to as X-935
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Revealed January 2011
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus XZ-1 Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Olympus FE-5020 and Olympus XZ-1, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras and both are sold by Olympus. The resolution of the FE-5020 (12MP) and the XZ-1 (10MP) is fairly similar but the FE-5020 (1/2.3") and XZ-1 (1/1.63") offer totally different sensor sizing.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe FE-5020 was manufactured 18 months earlier than the XZ-1 making them a generation apart from one another. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a more detailed comparison, here is a short summary of how the FE-5020 matches up against the XZ-1 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus XZ-1 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus FE-5020 & Olympus XZ-1. The entire galleries are available at Olympus FE-5020 Gallery & Olympus XZ-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5020 over the Olympus XZ-1
| FE-5020 | XZ-1 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Olympus FE-5020
| XZ-1 | FE-5020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2011 |  | July 2009 | More recent by 18 months |
| Manually focus |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 614k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+384k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus FE-5020 and Olympus XZ-1
| FE-5020 | XZ-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither has Touch display |
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus XZ-1 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to lug around your camera often, you should factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus FE-5020 has outside dimensions of 93mm x 56mm x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") having a weight of 137 grams (0.30 lbs) while the Olympus XZ-1 has measurements of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") having a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs).
Look at the Olympus FE-5020 and Olympus XZ-1 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have attached at that moment. The following is a front view size comparison of the FE-5020 against the XZ-1.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the FE-5020 and XZ-1 is 95 and 88 respectively.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus XZ-1 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's difficult to see the contrast between sensor measurements just by reviewing specifications. The graphic below should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the FE-5020 and XZ-1.
Plainly, the 2 cameras have different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The FE-5020 because of its tinier sensor will make achieving shallow DOF more challenging and the Olympus FE-5020 will deliver greater detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop images a bit more aggressively. The older FE-5020 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus XZ-1 Specifications
| Olympus FE-5020 | Olympus XZ-1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus FE-5020 | Olympus XZ-1 |
| Also Known as | X-935 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2009-07-22 | 2011-01-26 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III | TruePic V |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.63" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 8.07 x 5.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 44.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3664 x 2752 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.3-5.8 | f/1.8-2.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 614 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | - | OLED |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/500 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.10 m | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 137g (0.30 pounds) | 275g (0.61 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 93 x 56 x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 34 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 18.8 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.4 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 117 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 320 photos |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-42B | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | xD-Picture Card, microSD | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $160 | $567 |