Clicky

Olympus FE-5020 vs Panasonic ZS200

Portability
95
Imaging
35
Features
20
Overall
29
Olympus FE-5020 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 front
Portability
86
Imaging
53
Features
66
Overall
58

Olympus FE-5020 vs Panasonic ZS200 Key Specs

Olympus FE-5020
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 24-120mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
  • 137g - 93 x 56 x 25mm
  • Announced July 2009
  • Additionally Known as X-935
Panasonic ZS200
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 125 - 12800 (Expand to 25600)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • 24-360mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
  • 340g - 111 x 66 x 45mm
  • Released February 2018
  • Additionally Known as Lumix DC-TZ200
  • Earlier Model is Panasonic ZS100
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus FE-5020 vs Panasonic ZS200 Overview

Below is a detailed review of the Olympus FE-5020 vs Panasonic ZS200, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a sizable gap among the image resolutions of the FE-5020 (12MP) and ZS200 (20MP) and the FE-5020 (1/2.3") and ZS200 (1") feature different sensor sizes.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The FE-5020 was revealed 9 years earlier than the ZS200 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus FE-5020 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic ZS200 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before diving straight into a full comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the FE-5020 matches up against the ZS200 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5020 over the Panasonic ZS200

 FE-5020 ZS200 

Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS200 over the Olympus FE-5020

 ZS200 FE-5020 
ReleasedFebruary 2018July 2009More recent by 104 months
Manual focus Very exact focus
Screen dimension3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution1240k230kCrisper screen (+1010k dot)
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Olympus FE-5020 and Panasonic ZS200

 FE-5020 ZS200 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen

Olympus FE-5020 vs Panasonic ZS200 Physical Comparison

In case you're planning to lug around your camera often, you'll have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus FE-5020 provides outer dimensions of 93mm x 56mm x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") with a weight of 137 grams (0.30 lbs) and the Panasonic ZS200 has dimensions of 111mm x 66mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") with a weight of 340 grams (0.75 lbs).

Compare the Olympus FE-5020 vs Panasonic ZS200 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have at the time. Below is the front view size comparison of the FE-5020 versus the ZS200.

Olympus FE-5020 vs Panasonic ZS200 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the FE-5020 and ZS200 is 95 and 86 respectively.

Olympus FE-5020 vs Panasonic ZS200 top view buttons comparison

Olympus FE-5020 vs Panasonic ZS200 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it is very hard to visualize the difference in sensor measurements purely by researching a spec sheet. The visual below should give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the FE-5020 and ZS200.

Clearly, both of those cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The FE-5020 with its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF tougher and the Panasonic ZS200 will result in extra detail because of its extra 8MP. Higher resolution will let you crop shots much more aggressively. The older FE-5020 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus FE-5020 vs Panasonic ZS200 sensor size comparison

Olympus FE-5020 vs Panasonic ZS200 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus FE-5020 vs Panasonic ZS200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus FE-5020 Portrait photography advice
Panasonic ZS200 Portrait photography advice
21
lack of manual focus
no manual control
external flash not possible
MP count low (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
65
manual focus
decent megapixels (20 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (1")
provides face detection focus
saves RAW formats
can't use external flash
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus FE-5020
Street photography with Panasonic ZS200
60
environment sealing
lighter than competition in class (137 grams)
no moving screen
does not have image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
77
image stabilization (Optical)
sensor size is decent (1")
saves RAW formats
features touch to focus
no moving screen
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus FE-5020
Sports photography with Panasonic ZS200
24
environment sealing
low maximum shutter speed (1/500 seconds)
no shutter priority
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
70
great zoom range (24-360mm 15.0 x zoom)
silent shutter (1/16,000 seconds)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (20 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (1")
provides tracking autofocus
better than average battery (370 shots)
does not have phase detect auto focus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Olympus FE-5020 Travel photography features
Panasonic ZS200 Travel photography features
65
lighter than competition in class (137g)
environment sealing
has built in flash
pretty wide (24mm)
no Timelapse recording
MP count low (12 megapixels)
does not have selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
76
better than average battery (370 per charge)
has bluetooth
features touch to focus
decent megapixels (20MP)
flash built-in
reasonably wide (24mm)
great reach (360mm)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f3.3)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Olympus FE-5020 Landscape photography features
Panasonic ZS200 Landscape photography features
31
pretty wide (24mm)
environment sealing
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
tiny screen (2.7")
no manual control
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (12MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
no Timelapse recording
69
manual focus
reasonably wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (20 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (1")
saves RAW formats
better than average battery (370 CIPA)
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.3)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus FE-5020 as a Vlogging camera
Panasonic ZS200 as a Vlogging camera
28
pretty wide (24mm)
lighter than competition in class (137g)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
does not have selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
low quality video (640 x 480 pixels)
no microphone jack
35
reasonably wide (24mm)
screen is touchscreen
image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detection focus
video res high (3840 x 2160 pixels)
slow max aperture (f3.3)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
missing external microphone socket
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus FE-5020 vs Panasonic ZS200 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus FE-5020 and Panasonic ZS200
 Olympus FE-5020Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Panasonic
Model type Olympus FE-5020 Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200
Also called as X-935 Lumix DC-TZ200
Category Small Sensor Compact Large Sensor Compact
Announced 2009-07-22 2018-02-13
Physical type Compact Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic III Venus Engine
Sensor type CCD MOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 13.2 x 8.8mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 116.2mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 20MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 3968 x 2976 5472 x 3648
Maximum native ISO 1600 12800
Maximum boosted ISO - 25600
Minimum native ISO 64 125
RAW files
Minimum boosted ISO - 80
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points - 49
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-120mm (5.0x) 24-360mm (15.0x)
Maximal aperture f/3.3-5.8 f/3.3-6.4
Macro focusing range 1cm 5cm
Crop factor 5.8 2.7
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.7 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 230 thousand dots 1,240 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,330 thousand dots
Viewfinder coverage - 100%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.53x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4s 60s
Maximum shutter speed 1/500s 1/2000s
Maximum silent shutter speed - 1/16000s
Continuous shooting rate - 10.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 4.10 m 6.80 m (at Auto ISO)
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) -
Maximum video resolution 640x480 3840x2160
Video file format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) Yes
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 137 grams (0.30 lbs) 340 grams (0.75 lbs)
Dimensions 93 x 56 x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") 111 x 66 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 370 photos
Form of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID LI-42B -
Self timer Yes (12 seconds) Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage type xD-Picture Card, microSD SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible)
Card slots One One
Cost at launch $160 $800