Olympus FE-5020 vs Panasonic ZS200
95 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
86 Imaging
53 Features
66 Overall
58
Olympus FE-5020 vs Panasonic ZS200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-120mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 137g - 93 x 56 x 25mm
- Announced July 2009
- Additionally Known as X-935
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Expand to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-360mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 340g - 111 x 66 x 45mm
- Released February 2018
- Additionally Known as Lumix DC-TZ200
- Earlier Model is Panasonic ZS100
Olympus FE-5020 vs Panasonic ZS200 Overview
Below is a detailed review of the Olympus FE-5020 vs Panasonic ZS200, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a sizable gap among the image resolutions of the FE-5020 (12MP) and ZS200 (20MP) and the FE-5020 (1/2.3") and ZS200 (1") feature different sensor sizes.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe FE-5020 was revealed 9 years earlier than the ZS200 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus FE-5020 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic ZS200 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before diving straight into a full comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the FE-5020 matches up against the ZS200 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Panasonic ZS200 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus FE-5020 & Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200. The full galleries are provided at Olympus FE-5020 Gallery & Panasonic ZS200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5020 over the Panasonic ZS200
FE-5020 | ZS200 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS200 over the Olympus FE-5020
ZS200 | FE-5020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2018 | July 2009 | More recent by 104 months | |
Manual focus | Very exact focus | |||
Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 1240k | 230k | Crisper screen (+1010k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus FE-5020 and Panasonic ZS200
FE-5020 | ZS200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen |
Olympus FE-5020 vs Panasonic ZS200 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to lug around your camera often, you'll have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus FE-5020 provides outer dimensions of 93mm x 56mm x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") with a weight of 137 grams (0.30 lbs) and the Panasonic ZS200 has dimensions of 111mm x 66mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") with a weight of 340 grams (0.75 lbs).
Compare the Olympus FE-5020 vs Panasonic ZS200 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have at the time. Below is the front view size comparison of the FE-5020 versus the ZS200.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the FE-5020 and ZS200 is 95 and 86 respectively.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Panasonic ZS200 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very hard to visualize the difference in sensor measurements purely by researching a spec sheet. The visual below should give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the FE-5020 and ZS200.
Clearly, both of those cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The FE-5020 with its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF tougher and the Panasonic ZS200 will result in extra detail because of its extra 8MP. Higher resolution will let you crop shots much more aggressively. The older FE-5020 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Panasonic ZS200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus FE-5020 vs Panasonic ZS200 Specifications
Olympus FE-5020 | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus FE-5020 | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 |
Also called as | X-935 | Lumix DC-TZ200 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2009-07-22 | 2018-02-13 |
Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CCD | MOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 20MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 125 |
RAW files | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.3-5.8 | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 1,240 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,330 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.53x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/500s | 1/2000s |
Maximum silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000s |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.10 m | 6.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 137 grams (0.30 lbs) | 340 grams (0.75 lbs) |
Dimensions | 93 x 56 x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") | 111 x 66 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 370 photos |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-42B | - |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | xD-Picture Card, microSD | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $160 | $800 |