Olympus FE-5020 vs Panasonic FH27
95 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
94 Imaging
39 Features
34 Overall
37
Olympus FE-5020 vs Panasonic FH27 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-120mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 137g - 93 x 56 x 25mm
- Released July 2009
- Alternate Name is X-935
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-224mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 152g - 99 x 57 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2011
Olympus FE-5020 vs Panasonic FH27 Overview
Here, we will be analyzing the Olympus FE-5020 versus Panasonic FH27, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a sizeable gap between the resolutions of the FE-5020 (12MP) and FH27 (16MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe FE-5020 was launched 17 months before the FH27 which makes them a generation away from one another. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a more detailed comparison, here is a short summation of how the FE-5020 grades versus the FH27 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Panasonic FH27 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus FE-5020 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH27. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus FE-5020 Gallery and Panasonic FH27 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5020 over the Panasonic FH27
FE-5020 | FH27 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH27 over the Olympus FE-5020
FH27 | FE-5020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2011 | July 2009 | More modern by 17 months | |
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus FE-5020 and Panasonic FH27
FE-5020 | FH27 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | No manual focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | The same screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus FE-5020 vs Panasonic FH27 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry around your camera often, you will need to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus FE-5020 offers outside dimensions of 93mm x 56mm x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 137 grams (0.30 lbs) and the Panasonic FH27 has sizing of 99mm x 57mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus FE-5020 versus Panasonic FH27 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have attached at that moment. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the FE-5020 versus the FH27.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the FE-5020 and FH27 is 95 and 94 respectively.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Panasonic FH27 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's hard to envision the gap between sensor sizes purely by looking at specifications. The picture underneath will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the FE-5020 and FH27.
To sum up, both cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same megapixels. You should count on the Panasonic FH27 to give you greater detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The more aged FE-5020 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Panasonic FH27 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus FE-5020 vs Panasonic FH27 Specifications
Olympus FE-5020 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH27 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus FE-5020 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH27 |
Other name | X-935 | - |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2009-07-22 | 2011-01-05 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | Venus Engine VI |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 28-224mm (8.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.3-5.8 | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT Touch Screen LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/500 secs | 1/1600 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 4.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.10 m | 5.80 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 137 gr (0.30 lbs) | 152 gr (0.34 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 93 x 56 x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") | 99 x 57 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 250 photographs |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-42B | - |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | xD-Picture Card, microSD | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $160 | $229 |