Olympus FE-5020 vs Panasonic FS42
95 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
95 Imaging
33 Features
10 Overall
23
Olympus FE-5020 vs Panasonic FS42 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-120mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 137g - 93 x 56 x 25mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Other Name is X-935
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1000 (Expand to 6400)
- 640 x 480 video
- 33-132mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 132g - 98 x 55 x 22mm
- Launched April 2009
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus FE-5020 vs Panasonic FS42 Overview
Below is a in depth analysis of the Olympus FE-5020 versus Panasonic FS42, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the FE-5020 (12MP) and the FS42 (10MP) is pretty well matched but the FE-5020 (1/2.3") and FS42 (1/2.5") feature totally different sensor measurements.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe FE-5020 was released 4 months later than the FS42 so they are both of a similar age. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus FE-5020 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FS42 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going through a in-depth comparison, below is a quick overview of how the FE-5020 scores vs the FS42 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus FE-5020 vs Panasonic FS42 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus FE-5020 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42. The complete galleries are available at Olympus FE-5020 Gallery & Panasonic FS42 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5020 over the Panasonic FS42
| FE-5020 | FS42 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 2.7" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FS42 over the Olympus FE-5020
| FS42 | FE-5020 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus FE-5020 and Panasonic FS42
| FE-5020 | FS42 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | July 2009 |  | April 2009 | Similar age |
| Manual focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Identical screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Missing Touch screen |
Olympus FE-5020 vs Panasonic FS42 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you need to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus FE-5020 has got physical measurements of 93mm x 56mm x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") along with a weight of 137 grams (0.30 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FS42 has proportions of 98mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") with a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs).
Look at the Olympus FE-5020 versus Panasonic FS42 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing during that time. The following is the front view measurement comparison of the FE-5020 versus the FS42.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the FE-5020 and FS42 is 95 and 95 respectively.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Panasonic FS42 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is difficult to envision the gap between sensor measurements just by looking at specifications. The photograph underneath might give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the FE-5020 and FS42.
To sum up, both the cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The FE-5020 featuring a bigger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field less difficult and the Olympus FE-5020 will resolve greater detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots far more aggressively.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Panasonic FS42 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus FE-5020 vs Panasonic FS42 Specifications
| Olympus FE-5020 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model type | Olympus FE-5020 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 |
| Also called | X-935 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2009-07-22 | 2009-04-17 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.5" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 24.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1000 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 33-132mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.3-5.8 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 6.3 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 2.5 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/500 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.10 m | 6.30 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 137 gr (0.30 lb) | 132 gr (0.29 lb) |
| Dimensions | 93 x 56 x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") | 98 x 55 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | LI-42B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | xD-Picture Card, microSD | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $160 | $580 |
