Olympus FE-5020 vs Panasonic FZ2500
95 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
53 Imaging
53 Features
81 Overall
64
Olympus FE-5020 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-120mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 137g - 93 x 56 x 25mm
- Announced July 2009
- Additionally Known as X-935
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Bump to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 4096 x 2160 video
- 24-480mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 915g - 138 x 102 x 135mm
- Revealed September 2016
- Also referred to as Lumix DMC-FZ2000
- Previous Model is Panasonic FZ1000
Olympus FE-5020 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Overview
The following is a comprehensive analysis of the Olympus FE-5020 and Panasonic FZ2500, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Large Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There is a huge difference among the resolutions of the FE-5020 (12MP) and FZ2500 (20MP) and the FE-5020 (1/2.3") and FZ2500 (1") have different sensor dimensions.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe FE-5020 was unveiled 8 years prior to the FZ2500 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus FE-5020 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FZ2500 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving into a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief overview of how the FE-5020 matches up vs the FZ2500 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus FE-5020 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500. The full galleries are provided at Olympus FE-5020 Gallery and Panasonic FZ2500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5020 over the Panasonic FZ2500
FE-5020 | FZ2500 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ2500 over the Olympus FE-5020
FZ2500 | FE-5020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2016 | July 2009 | Newer by 87 months | |
Focus manually | Very precise focus | |||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 230k | Clearer display (+810k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus FE-5020 and Panasonic FZ2500
FE-5020 | FZ2500 |
---|
Olympus FE-5020 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to travel with your camera, you should consider its weight and volume. The Olympus FE-5020 enjoys exterior measurements of 93mm x 56mm x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") having a weight of 137 grams (0.30 lbs) and the Panasonic FZ2500 has sizing of 138mm x 102mm x 135mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 5.3") accompanied by a weight of 915 grams (2.02 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus FE-5020 and Panasonic FZ2500 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are utilising during that time. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the FE-5020 versus the FZ2500.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the FE-5020 and FZ2500 is 95 and 53 respectively.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be tough to visualize the difference in sensor dimensions just by checking out specs. The image underneath might offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the FE-5020 and FZ2500.
All in all, the 2 cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The FE-5020 with its smaller sensor is going to make getting bokeh more difficult and the Panasonic FZ2500 will produce greater detail having an extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The more aged FE-5020 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus FE-5020 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Specifications
Olympus FE-5020 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus FE-5020 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 |
Otherwise known as | X-935 | Lumix DMC-FZ2000 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2009-07-22 | 2016-09-19 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Min boosted ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.3-5.8 | f/2.8-4.5 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 1,040 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/500s | 1/4000s |
Highest quiet shutter speed | - | 1/16000s |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 12.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.10 m | 13.20 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 4096 x 2060 @ 24p / 100 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 4096x2160 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 137 grams (0.30 lbs) | 915 grams (2.02 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 93 x 56 x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") | 138 x 102 x 135mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 5.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 70 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.0 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.6 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 538 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 350 photos |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-42B | DMW-BLC12 |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | xD-Picture Card, microSD | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $160 | $998 |