Olympus FE-5020 vs Panasonic GF5
95 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
89 Imaging
48 Features
54 Overall
50
Olympus FE-5020 vs Panasonic GF5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-120mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 137g - 93 x 56 x 25mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Also Known as X-935
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 160 - 12800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 267g - 108 x 67 x 37mm
- Released April 2012
- Replaced the Panasonic GF3
- Successor is Panasonic GF6
Olympus FE-5020 vs Panasonic GF5 Overview
Its time to take a closer look at the Olympus FE-5020 vs Panasonic GF5, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the FE-5020 (12MP) and the GF5 (12MP) is relatively close but the FE-5020 (1/2.3") and GF5 (Four Thirds) offer different sensor dimensions.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe FE-5020 was launched 3 years earlier than the GF5 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus FE-5020 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic GF5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going into a in depth comparison, here is a simple summation of how the FE-5020 scores versus the GF5 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Panasonic GF5 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus FE-5020 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF5. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus FE-5020 Gallery and Panasonic GF5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5020 over the Panasonic GF5
FE-5020 | GF5 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic GF5 over the Olympus FE-5020
GF5 | FE-5020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | April 2012 | July 2009 | Newer by 32 months | |
Manual focus | More precise focusing | |||
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus FE-5020 and Panasonic GF5
FE-5020 | GF5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen |
Olympus FE-5020 vs Panasonic GF5 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to travel with your camera frequently, you will need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus FE-5020 has got external measurements of 93mm x 56mm x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") having a weight of 137 grams (0.30 lbs) and the Panasonic GF5 has proportions of 108mm x 67mm x 37mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.5") and a weight of 267 grams (0.59 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus FE-5020 vs Panasonic GF5 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you choose during that time. Here is a front view scale comparison of the FE-5020 and the GF5.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the FE-5020 and GF5 is 95 and 89 respectively.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Panasonic GF5 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is hard to imagine the gap in sensor dimensions only by looking through technical specs. The pic below will offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the FE-5020 and GF5.
As you have seen, both cameras provide the same megapixels albeit different sensor dimensions. The FE-5020 features the smaller sensor which should make obtaining shallow DOF harder. The more aged FE-5020 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Panasonic GF5 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus FE-5020 vs Panasonic GF5 Specifications
Olympus FE-5020 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus FE-5020 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF5 |
Also referred to as | X-935 | - |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2009-07-22 | 2012-04-05 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | Venus Engine FHD |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 160 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens zoom range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/3.3-5.8 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT Color LCD with wide-viewing angle |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/500 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 4.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.10 m | 6.30 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | - | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 137 gr (0.30 lb) | 267 gr (0.59 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 93 x 56 x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") | 108 x 67 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 50 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 20.5 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.0 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 573 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 360 photographs |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-42B | - |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images)) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | xD-Picture Card, microSD | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $160 | $600 |