Olympus FE-5020 vs Panasonic ZS100
95 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
87 Imaging
52 Features
65 Overall
57
Olympus FE-5020 vs Panasonic ZS100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-120mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 137g - 93 x 56 x 25mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Additionally Known as X-935
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Expand to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-250mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 312g - 111 x 65 x 44mm
- Announced January 2016
- Also Known as Lumix DMC-TZ100
- New Model is Panasonic ZS200
Olympus FE-5020 vs Panasonic ZS100 Overview
Below is a in depth comparison of the Olympus FE-5020 versus Panasonic ZS100, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a substantial gap among the image resolutions of the FE-5020 (12MP) and ZS100 (20MP) and the FE-5020 (1/2.3") and ZS100 (1") posses totally different sensor sizes.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe FE-5020 was manufactured 7 years earlier than the ZS100 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus FE-5020 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic ZS100 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before diving straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a brief view of how the FE-5020 grades versus the ZS100 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Panasonic ZS100 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus FE-5020 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100. The entire galleries are available at Olympus FE-5020 Gallery & Panasonic ZS100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5020 over the Panasonic ZS100
FE-5020 | ZS100 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS100 over the Olympus FE-5020
ZS100 | FE-5020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2016 | July 2009 | More recent by 78 months | |
Manually focus | More accurate focusing | |||
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 230k | Crisper screen (+810k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus FE-5020 and Panasonic ZS100
FE-5020 | ZS100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Olympus FE-5020 vs Panasonic ZS100 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to lug around your camera, you have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus FE-5020 comes with exterior dimensions of 93mm x 56mm x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") and a weight of 137 grams (0.30 lbs) while the Panasonic ZS100 has dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 44mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") with a weight of 312 grams (0.69 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus FE-5020 versus Panasonic ZS100 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have during that time. Underneath is a front view over all size comparison of the FE-5020 vs the ZS100.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the FE-5020 and ZS100 is 95 and 87 respectively.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Panasonic ZS100 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its difficult to see the gap in sensor measurements simply by going through technical specs. The visual below will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the FE-5020 and ZS100.
As you can tell, both the cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The FE-5020 due to its smaller sensor will make getting shallower DOF tougher and the Panasonic ZS100 will provide more detail due to its extra 8MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs way more aggressively. The older FE-5020 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Panasonic ZS100 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus FE-5020 vs Panasonic ZS100 Specifications
Olympus FE-5020 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus FE-5020 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100 |
Also Known as | X-935 | Lumix DMC-TZ100 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2009-07-22 | 2016-01-05 |
Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CCD | MOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 125 |
RAW format | ||
Min enhanced ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 25-250mm (10.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.3-5.8 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 1,040k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,166k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.46x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
Max shutter speed | 1/500s | 1/2000s |
Max silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000s |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 9.9 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.10 m | 8.00 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 4K/UHD (3840 x 2160 @ 30p/24p), 1920 x 1080 @ 60p/60i/30p/24p, 640 x 480 (30p) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 137 grams (0.30 pounds) | 312 grams (0.69 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 93 x 56 x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") | 111 x 65 x 44mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 70 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.8 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.5 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 559 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 images |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-42B | - |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | xD-Picture Card, microSD | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $160 | $700 |