Olympus FE-5020 vs Panasonic ZS5
95 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
92 Imaging
35 Features
30 Overall
33
Olympus FE-5020 vs Panasonic ZS5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-120mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 137g - 93 x 56 x 25mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Also Known as X-935
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-300mm (F3.3-4.9) lens
- 214g - 103 x 60 x 32mm
- Launched June 2010
- Other Name is Lumix DMC-TZ8
Olympus FE-5020 vs Panasonic ZS5 Overview
In this article, we are looking at the Olympus FE-5020 and Panasonic ZS5, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the FE-5020 (12MP) and the ZS5 (12MP) is fairly close and they enjoy the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe FE-5020 was unveiled 10 months prior to the ZS5 and they are both of a similar generation. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a detailed comparison, below is a short summary of how the FE-5020 grades against the ZS5 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Panasonic ZS5 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus FE-5020 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS5. The full galleries are provided at Olympus FE-5020 Gallery and Panasonic ZS5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5020 over the Panasonic ZS5
FE-5020 | ZS5 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS5 over the Olympus FE-5020
ZS5 | FE-5020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | June 2010 | July 2009 | Fresher by 10 months |
Common features in the Olympus FE-5020 and Panasonic ZS5
FE-5020 | ZS5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Lack of manual focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display sizing | 2.7" | 2.7" | Equivalent display size | |
Display resolution | 230k | 230k | The same display resolution | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither comes with Touch friendly display |
Olympus FE-5020 vs Panasonic ZS5 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry your camera, you should think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus FE-5020 comes with physical dimensions of 93mm x 56mm x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") with a weight of 137 grams (0.30 lbs) whilst the Panasonic ZS5 has proportions of 103mm x 60mm x 32mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 214 grams (0.47 lbs).
Check the Olympus FE-5020 and Panasonic ZS5 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you choose at that moment. The following is the front view proportions comparison of the FE-5020 compared to the ZS5.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the FE-5020 and ZS5 is 95 and 92 respectively.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Panasonic ZS5 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very tough to see the contrast in sensor sizing purely by looking through a spec sheet. The graphic here may give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the FE-5020 and ZS5.
As you can see, each of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the exact same megapixels and you should expect comparable quality of photos although you may want to consider the production date of the cameras into account. The older FE-5020 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Panasonic ZS5 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus FE-5020 vs Panasonic ZS5 Specifications
Olympus FE-5020 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus FE-5020 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS5 |
Also called as | X-935 | Lumix DMC-TZ8 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2009-07-22 | 2010-06-16 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | Venus Engine HD II |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 25-300mm (12.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.3-5.8 | f/3.3-4.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
Max shutter speed | 1/500s | 1/1300s |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.10 m | 5.30 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 137g (0.30 lbs) | 214g (0.47 lbs) |
Dimensions | 93 x 56 x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") | 103 x 60 x 32mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | LI-42B | - |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | xD-Picture Card, microSD | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $160 | $300 |