Olympus FE-5020 vs Ricoh CX5
95 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
92 Imaging
33 Features
35 Overall
33
Olympus FE-5020 vs Ricoh CX5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-120mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 137g - 93 x 56 x 25mm
- Released July 2009
- Other Name is X-935
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Announced July 2011
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus FE-5020 vs Ricoh CX5 Overview
On this page, we will be matching up the Olympus FE-5020 versus Ricoh CX5, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the FE-5020 (12MP) and the CX5 (10MP) is pretty similar and both cameras posses the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe FE-5020 was launched 24 months prior to the CX5 which makes them a generation apart from each other. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the FE-5020 grades versus the CX5 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus FE-5020 vs Ricoh CX5 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus FE-5020 & Ricoh CX5. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus FE-5020 Gallery & Ricoh CX5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5020 over the Ricoh CX5
| FE-5020 | CX5 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX5 over the Olympus FE-5020
| CX5 | FE-5020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | July 2011 |  | July 2009 | Fresher by 24 months |
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus FE-5020 and Ricoh CX5
| FE-5020 | CX5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Olympus FE-5020 vs Ricoh CX5 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry your camera, you need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus FE-5020 has external measurements of 93mm x 56mm x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") with a weight of 137 grams (0.30 lbs) and the Ricoh CX5 has dimensions of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
Examine the Olympus FE-5020 versus Ricoh CX5 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you choose at the time. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the FE-5020 and the CX5.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the FE-5020 and CX5 is 95 and 92 respectively.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Ricoh CX5 Sensor Comparison
Often, its tough to see the gap between sensor sizing just by reviewing specs. The graphic here might give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the FE-5020 and CX5.
As you can plainly see, both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Olympus FE-5020 to offer you more detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures more aggressively. The older FE-5020 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Ricoh CX5 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus FE-5020 vs Ricoh CX5 Specifications
| Olympus FE-5020 | Ricoh CX5 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus FE-5020 | Ricoh CX5 |
| Alternative name | X-935 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2009-07-22 | 2011-07-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.3-5.8 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/500 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.10 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 137 grams (0.30 lbs) | 205 grams (0.45 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 93 x 56 x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | LI-42B | DB-100 |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | xD-Picture Card, microSD | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $160 | $399 |