Olympus FE-5020 vs Ricoh G700SE
95 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
88 Imaging
35 Features
29 Overall
32
Olympus FE-5020 vs Ricoh G700SE Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-120mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 137g - 93 x 56 x 25mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Alternative Name is X-935
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 307g - 117 x 68 x 32mm
- Revealed October 2010
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus FE-5020 vs Ricoh G700SE Overview
Its time to look much closer at the Olympus FE-5020 vs Ricoh G700SE, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by companies Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the FE-5020 (12MP) and the G700SE (12MP) is fairly similar and they possess the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe FE-5020 was revealed 14 months before the G700SE making the cameras a generation away from each other. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick summation of how the FE-5020 matches up versus the G700SE with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus FE-5020 vs Ricoh G700SE Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus FE-5020 and Ricoh G700SE. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus FE-5020 Gallery and Ricoh G700SE Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5020 over the Ricoh G700SE
| FE-5020 | G700SE |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh G700SE over the Olympus FE-5020
| G700SE | FE-5020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | October 2010 |  | July 2009 | Newer by 14 months |
| Manual focus |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus FE-5020 and Ricoh G700SE
| FE-5020 | G700SE | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Olympus FE-5020 vs Ricoh G700SE Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus FE-5020 enjoys exterior measurements of 93mm x 56mm x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") and a weight of 137 grams (0.30 lbs) while the Ricoh G700SE has dimensions of 117mm x 68mm x 32mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 307 grams (0.68 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus FE-5020 vs Ricoh G700SE in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have attached at that moment. Here is the front view dimensions comparison of the FE-5020 vs the G700SE.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the FE-5020 and G700SE is 95 and 88 respectively.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Ricoh G700SE Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is hard to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions purely by going over specs. The pic here may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the FE-5020 and G700SE.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the same exact MP so you should expect similar quality of files although you need to consider the release date of the products into consideration. The more aged FE-5020 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Ricoh G700SE Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus FE-5020 vs Ricoh G700SE Specifications
| Olympus FE-5020 | Ricoh G700SE | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus FE-5020 | Ricoh G700SE |
| Alternative name | X-935 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2009-07-22 | 2010-10-13 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 64 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.3-5.8 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 230k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/500 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.10 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Auto red-eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 640 x 480, 320 x 240 |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Optional |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 137 grams (0.30 pounds) | 307 grams (0.68 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 93 x 56 x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") | 117 x 68 x 32mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | LI-42B | DB-60 |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | xD-Picture Card, microSD | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail price | $160 | $0 |