Clicky

Olympus FE-5020 vs Ricoh GR Digital III

Portability
95
Imaging
35
Features
20
Overall
29
Olympus FE-5020 front
 
Ricoh GR Digital III front
Portability
92
Imaging
34
Features
35
Overall
34

Olympus FE-5020 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Key Specs

Olympus FE-5020
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 24-120mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
  • 137g - 93 x 56 x 25mm
  • Introduced July 2009
  • Also referred to as X-935
Ricoh GR Digital III
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28mm (F1.9) lens
  • 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
  • Introduced July 2009
  • Successor is Ricoh GR Digital IV
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus FE-5020 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Overview

Below is a detailed review of the Olympus FE-5020 and Ricoh GR Digital III, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by brands Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the FE-5020 (12MP) and the GR Digital III (10MP) is very similar but the FE-5020 (1/2.3") and GR Digital III (1/1.7") have different sensor sizes.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The FE-5020 was brought out very close to the GR Digital III so they are both of a similar generation. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before we go right into a detailed comparison, here is a concise summation of how the FE-5020 grades against the GR Digital III for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5020 over the Ricoh GR Digital III

 FE-5020 GR Digital III 

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Olympus FE-5020

 GR Digital III FE-5020 
Manually focus Very precise focusing
Display size3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution920k230kSharper display (+690k dot)

Common features in the Olympus FE-5020 and Ricoh GR Digital III

 FE-5020 GR Digital III 
IntroducedJuly 2009July 2009Similar generation
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither comes with Touch friendly display

Olympus FE-5020 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Physical Comparison

When you are going to lug around your camera frequently, you'll need to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus FE-5020 comes with physical dimensions of 93mm x 56mm x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 137 grams (0.30 lbs) and the Ricoh GR Digital III has proportions of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") having a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs).

Examine the Olympus FE-5020 and Ricoh GR Digital III in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are working with at that moment. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the FE-5020 vs the GR Digital III.

Olympus FE-5020 vs Ricoh GR Digital III size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the FE-5020 and GR Digital III is 95 and 92 respectively.

Olympus FE-5020 vs Ricoh GR Digital III top view buttons comparison

Olympus FE-5020 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Sensor Comparison

Typically, it can be hard to picture the gap between sensor measurements only by reviewing a spec sheet. The graphic underneath will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the FE-5020 and GR Digital III.

As you can see, both of the cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The FE-5020 because of its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field trickier and the Olympus FE-5020 will offer you greater detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop pics way more aggressively.

Olympus FE-5020 vs Ricoh GR Digital III sensor size comparison

Olympus FE-5020 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus FE-5020 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus FE-5020 Portrait photography factors
Ricoh GR Digital III Portrait photography factors
21
manual focus not available
lack of manual mode
can't use external flash
resolution not great (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
40
manual focus
saves RAW files
megapixel count low (10MP)
small sensor size (1/1.7")
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Olympus FE-5020 Street photography highlights
Ricoh GR Digital III Street photography highlights
60
weather sealing
lighter than average in class (137 grams)
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
55
saves RAW files
screen is fixed
does not have image stabilization
small sensor size (1/1.7")
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Olympus FE-5020 Sports photography highlights
Ricoh GR Digital III Sports photography highlights
24
weather sealing
low maximum shutter speed (1/500s)
lack of shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
17
fixed focal length (28mm)
does not have image stabilization
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/1.7")
lack of phase detect autofocus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Olympus FE-5020 Travel photography advice
Ricoh GR Digital III Travel photography advice
65
lighter than average in class (137g)
weather sealing
has built in flash
decently wide (24mm)
lack of Timelapse recording
resolution not great (12MP)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.3)
63
has built in flash
very good max aperture (f1.9)
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Olympus FE-5020 Landscape photography advice
Ricoh GR Digital III Landscape photography advice
31
decently wide (24mm)
weather sealing
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.3)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inches)
lack of manual mode
lack of image stabilization
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
lack of Timelapse recording
45
manual focus
very good max aperture (f1.9)
pretty good screen size (3")
saves RAW files
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (28mm)
does not have image stabilization
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/1.7")
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus FE-5020 Vlogging information
Ricoh GR Digital III Vlogging information
28
decently wide (24mm)
lighter than average in class (137 grams)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.3)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
lack of image stabilization
video resolution low (640 x 480 pixels)
lack of external microphone support
25
very good max aperture (f1.9)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
video resolution low (640 x 480 pixels)
does not have mic port
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus FE-5020 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus FE-5020 and Ricoh GR Digital III
 Olympus FE-5020Ricoh GR Digital III
General Information
Company Olympus Ricoh
Model Olympus FE-5020 Ricoh GR Digital III
Other name X-935 -
Class Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Introduced 2009-07-22 2009-07-27
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic III GR engine III
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/1.7"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Maximum resolution 3968 x 2976 3648 x 2736
Maximum native ISO 1600 1600
Min native ISO 64 64
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-120mm (5.0x) 28mm (1x)
Largest aperture f/3.3-5.8 f/1.9
Macro focus distance 1cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 4.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.7 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 230 thousand dot 920 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Optical (optional)
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 seconds 1 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/500 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 4.10 m 3.00 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 640x480
Video data format Motion JPEG -
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 137 gr (0.30 lbs) 208 gr (0.46 lbs)
Physical dimensions 93 x 56 x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model LI-42B -
Self timer Yes (12 seconds) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage xD-Picture Card, microSD SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots One One
Launch cost $160 $399