Clicky

Olympus FE-5020 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV

Portability
95
Imaging
35
Features
20
Overall
29
Olympus FE-5020 front
 
Ricoh GR Digital IV front
Portability
92
Imaging
35
Features
47
Overall
39

Olympus FE-5020 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Key Specs

Olympus FE-5020
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 24-120mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
  • 137g - 93 x 56 x 25mm
  • Announced July 2009
  • Also referred to as X-935
Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28mm (F1.9) lens
  • 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
  • Revealed September 2011
  • Superseded the Ricoh GR Digital III
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus FE-5020 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Overview

Let's look more in depth at the Olympus FE-5020 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by brands Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the FE-5020 (12MP) and the GR Digital IV (10MP) is pretty close but the FE-5020 (1/2.3") and GR Digital IV (1/1.7") boast totally different sensor sizing.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The FE-5020 was launched 3 years before the GR Digital IV which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before diving into a in-depth comparison, here is a simple view of how the FE-5020 matches up versus the GR Digital IV when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5020 over the Ricoh GR Digital IV

 FE-5020 GR Digital IV 

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Olympus FE-5020

 GR Digital IV FE-5020 
RevealedSeptember 2011July 2009Newer by 26 months
Manually focus More accurate focusing
Screen dimensions3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution1230k230kClearer screen (+1000k dot)

Common features in the Olympus FE-5020 and Ricoh GR Digital IV

 FE-5020 GR Digital IV 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither features Touch friendly screen

Olympus FE-5020 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Physical Comparison

For anyone who is intending to travel with your camera regularly, you are going to need to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus FE-5020 enjoys exterior dimensions of 93mm x 56mm x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") along with a weight of 137 grams (0.30 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GR Digital IV has sizing of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).

Analyze the Olympus FE-5020 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the FE-5020 vs the GR Digital IV.

Olympus FE-5020 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the FE-5020 and GR Digital IV is 95 and 92 respectively.

Olympus FE-5020 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV top view buttons comparison

Olympus FE-5020 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it can be difficult to see the difference in sensor dimensions purely by viewing specs. The image below will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the FE-5020 and GR Digital IV.

All in all, both of the cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The FE-5020 because of its smaller sensor will make achieving bokeh more challenging and the Olympus FE-5020 will provide you with greater detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots more aggressively. The more aged FE-5020 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus FE-5020 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV sensor size comparison

Olympus FE-5020 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus FE-5020 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus FE-5020 Portrait photography factors
Ricoh GR Digital IV Portrait photography factors
21
manual focus not available
no manual exposure
external flash not possible
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
41
has manual focus
delivers RAW files
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/1.7")
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Olympus FE-5020 as a Street photography camera
Ricoh GR Digital IV as a Street photography camera
60
weather proof
lighter than others in class (137g)
no articulating screen
lack of image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
65
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW files
screen is fixed
sensor size is very small (1/1.7")
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus FE-5020
Sports photography with Ricoh GR Digital IV
24
weather proof
max shutter speed is low (1/500 seconds)
lack of shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
low megapixels (12MP)
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
34
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
great battery life (390 per charge)
fixed focal length (28mm)
megapixel count low (10MP)
sensor size is very small (1/1.7")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Olympus FE-5020 as a Travel photography camera
Ricoh GR Digital IV as a Travel photography camera
65
lighter than others in class (137 grams)
weather proof
flash built-in
relatively wide (24mm)
lack of Time Lapse recording
low megapixels (12MP)
does not offer selfie friendly display
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
67
great battery life (390 shots)
flash built-in
very good maximum aperture (f1.9)
megapixel count low (10MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Olympus FE-5020 Landscape photography factors
Ricoh GR Digital IV Landscape photography factors
31
relatively wide (24mm)
weather proof
manual focus not available
can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
screen is small (2.7")
no manual exposure
lack of image stabilization
low megapixels (12MP)
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
lack of Time Lapse recording
53
has manual focus
very good maximum aperture (f1.9)
nice screen size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW files
great battery life (390 CIPA)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (28mm)
megapixel count low (10MP)
sensor size is very small (1/1.7")
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus FE-5020 as a Vlogging camera
Ricoh GR Digital IV as a Vlogging camera
28
relatively wide (24mm)
lighter than others in class (137 grams)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
does not offer selfie friendly display
lack of image stabilization
low video resolution (640 x 480 pxls)
lack of external mic socket
29
very good maximum aperture (f1.9)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
display isn't selfie friendly
low res video (640 x 480 pxls)
lack of mic port
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus FE-5020 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus FE-5020 and Ricoh GR Digital IV
 Olympus FE-5020Ricoh GR Digital IV
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Ricoh
Model Olympus FE-5020 Ricoh GR Digital IV
Also Known as X-935 -
Class Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Announced 2009-07-22 2011-09-15
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic III -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/1.7"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Highest Possible resolution 3968 x 2976 3648 x 2736
Maximum native ISO 1600 3200
Lowest native ISO 64 80
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-120mm (5.0x) 28mm (1x)
Highest aperture f/3.3-5.8 f/1.9
Macro focus distance 1cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 4.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 2.7 inches 3 inches
Resolution of display 230k dot 1,230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Optical (optional)
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4 seconds 1 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/500 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 4.10 m 3.00 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 640x480
Video data format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 137 grams (0.30 lb) 190 grams (0.42 lb)
Physical dimensions 93 x 56 x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 390 photos
Battery form - Battery Pack
Battery model LI-42B DB65
Self timer Yes (12 seconds) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage xD-Picture Card, microSD SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots One One
Retail pricing $160 $599