Olympus FE-5020 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
95 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
88 Imaging
52 Features
37 Overall
46
Olympus FE-5020 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-120mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 137g - 93 x 56 x 25mm
- Announced July 2009
- Also Known as X-935
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28mm (F2.5) lens
- 140g - 113 x 70 x 56mm
- Announced September 2010
Olympus FE-5020 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Overview
Its time to look much closer at the Olympus FE-5020 versus Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the FE-5020 (12MP) and the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 (12MP) is fairly well matched but the FE-5020 (1/2.3") and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 (APS-C) boast totally different sensor measurements.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe FE-5020 was unveiled 14 months prior to the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 making them a generation apart from one another. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus FE-5020 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a concise overview of how the FE-5020 matches up vs the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus FE-5020 and Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5. The full galleries are provided at Olympus FE-5020 Gallery and Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5020 over the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
FE-5020 | GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 over the Olympus FE-5020
GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | FE-5020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2010 | July 2009 | Fresher by 14 months | |
Manual focus | Very accurate focus | |||
Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus FE-5020 and Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
FE-5020 | GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Missing Touch display |
Olympus FE-5020 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry your camera regularly, you will need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus FE-5020 offers outside dimensions of 93mm x 56mm x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") and a weight of 137 grams (0.30 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 has measurements of 113mm x 70mm x 56mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 2.2") and a weight of 140 grams (0.31 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus FE-5020 versus Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have attached at that time. Here is a front view dimensions comparison of the FE-5020 vs the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the FE-5020 and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 is 95 and 88 respectively.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is hard to envision the gap between sensor sizing simply by checking technical specs. The photograph underneath will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the FE-5020 and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5.
As you can tell, both cameras feature the identical megapixels but not the same sensor sizing. The FE-5020 contains the tinier sensor which should make getting bokeh harder. The older FE-5020 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus FE-5020 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Specifications
Olympus FE-5020 | Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus FE-5020 | Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 |
Alternate name | X-935 | - |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Announced | 2009-07-22 | 2010-09-21 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | GR Engine III |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4288 x 2848 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 200 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Max aperture | f/3.3-5.8 | f/2.5 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 180 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/500 secs | 1/3200 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.10 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 137 gr (0.30 lbs) | 140 gr (0.31 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 93 x 56 x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") | 113 x 70 x 56mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 2.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 320 photographs |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-42B | DB-90 |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | xD-Picture Card, microSD | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $160 | $566 |